344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27906775)
21. Development of a Korean Liver Allocation System using Model for End Stage Liver Disease Scores: A Nationwide, Multicenter study.
Lee J; Lee JG; Jung I; Joo DJ; Kim SI; Kim MS;
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7495. PubMed ID: 31097768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The extent and predictors of waiting time geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.
Davis AE; Mehrotra S; McElroy LM; Friedewald JJ; Skaro AI; Lapin B; Kang R; Holl JL; Abecassis MM; Ladner DP
Transplantation; 2014 May; 97(10):1049-57. PubMed ID: 24374790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Impact of Redistricting Proposals on Health Care Expenditures for Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients.
Gentry SE; Chow EK; Dzebisashvili N; Schnitzler MA; Lentine KL; Wickliffe CE; Shteyn E; Pyke J; Israni A; Kasiske B; Segev DL; Axelrod DA
Am J Transplant; 2016 Feb; 16(2):583-93. PubMed ID: 26779694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors that affect deceased donor liver transplantation rates in the United States in addition to the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score.
Sharma P; Schaubel DE; Messersmith EE; Guidinger MK; Merion RM
Liver Transpl; 2012 Dec; 18(12):1456-63. PubMed ID: 22965903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the MELD impact.
Sharma P; Balan V; Hernandez JL; Harper AM; Edwards EB; Rodriguez-Luna H; Byrne T; Vargas HE; Mulligan D; Rakela J; Wiesner RH
Liver Transpl; 2004 Jan; 10(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14755775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MELD-based liver allocation: who is underserved?
Biggins SW; Bambha K
Semin Liver Dis; 2006 Aug; 26(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 16850370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Directed solutions to address differences in access to liver transplantation.
Ye F; Sheng Q; Feurer ID; Zhao Z; Fan R; Teng J; Ping J; Rega SA; Hanto DW; Shyr Y; Karp SJ
Am J Transplant; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2670-2678. PubMed ID: 29689125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. State-Based Liver Distribution: Broad Sharing With Less Harm to Vulnerable and Underserved Communities Compared With Concentric Circles.
Lynch RJ; Ye F; Sheng Q; Zhao Z; Karp SJ
Liver Transpl; 2019 Apr; 25(4):588-597. PubMed ID: 30873761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Offer patterns of nationally placed livers by donation service area.
Lai JC; Feng S; Vittinghoff E; Roberts JP
Liver Transpl; 2013 Apr; 19(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 23447450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.
Coombes JM; Trotter JF
Clin Med Res; 2005 May; 3(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 16012126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An opposing view to United States liver allocation problems with broader sharing.
Goldberg D
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Apr; 25(2):110-114. PubMed ID: 32073491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Evolution of Organ Allocation for Liver Transplantation: Tackling Geographic Disparity Through Broader Sharing.
Axelrod DA; Vagefi PA; Roberts JP
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 26164429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Geographic differences in access to transplantation in the United States.
Ellison MD; Edwards LB; Edwards EB; Barker CF
Transplantation; 2003 Nov; 76(9):1389-94. PubMed ID: 14627922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New paradigms for organ allocation and distribution in liver transplantation.
Kalra A; Biggins SW
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2018 May; 34(3):123-131. PubMed ID: 29465430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predicting Outcomes on the Liver Transplant Waiting List in the United States: Accounting for Large Regional Variation in Organ Availability and Priority Allocation Points.
Hart A; Schladt DP; Zeglin J; Pyke J; Kim WR; Lake JR; Roberts JP; Hirose R; Mulligan DC; Kasiske BL; Snyder JJ; Israni AK
Transplantation; 2016 Oct; 100(10):2153-9. PubMed ID: 27490411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Balancing Efficiency and Fairness in Liver Transplant Access: Tradeoff Curves for the Assessment of Organ Distribution Policies.
Bertsimas D; Papalexopoulos T; Trichakis N; Wang Y; Hirose R; Vagefi PA
Transplantation; 2020 May; 104(5):981-987. PubMed ID: 31644494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Age and equity in liver transplantation: An organ allocation model.
Cucchetti A; Ross LF; Thistlethwaite JR; Vitale A; Ravaioli M; Cescon M; Ercolani G; Burra P; Cillo U; Pinna AD
Liver Transpl; 2015 Oct; 21(10):1241-9. PubMed ID: 26174971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Advances in liver transplantation allocation systems.
Schilsky ML; Moini M
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Mar; 22(10):2922-30. PubMed ID: 26973389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Geographic differences in event rates by model for end-stage liver disease score.
Roberts JP; Dykstra DM; Goodrich NP; Rush SH; Merion RM; Port FK
Am J Transplant; 2006 Oct; 6(10):2470-5. PubMed ID: 16939519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Very complicated math--reconfiguring organ allocation.
Lamas D; Rosenbaum L
N Engl J Med; 2014 Dec; 371(26):2447-50. PubMed ID: 25539103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
