186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27908030)
21. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
Rader T
HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
Fogerty D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking With Single-Sided Vocoders.
Wess JM; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):374-386. PubMed ID: 28002083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
Benard MR; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J
Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):322-337. PubMed ID: 35394798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Age effects on perceptual restoration of degraded interrupted sentences.
Jaekel BN; Newman RS; Goupell MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):84. PubMed ID: 29390768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.
Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1627-37. PubMed ID: 19045654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving the Intelligibility of Speech for Simulated Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Using Fully Convolutional Neural Networks.
Wang NY; Wang HS; Wang TW; Fu SW; Lu X; Wang HM; Tsao Y
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():184-195. PubMed ID: 33275585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Robustness against distortion of fundamental frequency cues in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
Vermeulen A; Verschuur C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):229. PubMed ID: 27475149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 26650652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
Başkent D; Chatterjee M
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
