139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27908162)
1. An efficient method to determine double Gaussian fluence parameters in the eclipse™ proton pencil beam model.
Shen J; Liu W; Stoker J; Ding X; Anand A; Hu Y; Herman MG; Bues M
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6544. PubMed ID: 27908162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using field size factors to characterize the in-air fluence of a proton machine with a range shifter.
Shen J; Lentz JM; Hu Y; Liu W; Morales DH; Stoker JB; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):52. PubMed ID: 28288673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nuclear halo measurements for accurate prediction of field size factor in a Varian ProBeam proton PBS system.
Harms J; Chang CW; Zhang R; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31793202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine.
Kugel F; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Janson M; Kretschmer J; Brodbek L; Behrends C; Verbeek N; Looe HK; Poppe B; Timmermann B
Z Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 33(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 36577626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D treatment planning system-Varian Eclipse for proton therapy planning.
Sahoo N; Poenisch F; Zhang X; Li Y; Lii M; Li H; Gautam AS; Wu R; Gillin M; Zhu XR
Med Dosim; 2018 Summer; 43(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 29753334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
Rana S; Samuel EJJ
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical Note: Clinical modeling and validation of breast tissue expander metallic ports in a commercial treatment planning system for proton therapy.
Kang Y; Shen J; Bues M; Hu Y; Liu W; Ding X
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7512-7525. PubMed ID: 34519357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the range shifter model for proton pencil-beam scanning for the Eclipse v.11 treatment planning system.
Matysiak W; Yeung D; Slopsema R; Li Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):391-404. PubMed ID: 27074461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Range optimization for mono- and bi-energetic proton modulated arc therapy with pencil beam scanning.
Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Kirk M; Fager M; Burgdorf B; Stowe M; Solberg T; Carabe A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N565-N574. PubMed ID: 27740944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of varying planning parameters on proton pencil beam scanning dose distributions in four commercial treatment planning systems.
Alshaikhi J; Doolan PJ; D'Souza D; Holloway SM; Amos RA; Royle G
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1150-1162. PubMed ID: 30632173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beam delivery sequencing for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Trofimov A; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(10):1321-31. PubMed ID: 12812449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of a golden beam data set for the commissioning of a proton double-scattering system in a pencil-beam dose calculation algorithm.
Slopsema RL; Lin L; Flampouri S; Yeung D; Li Z; McDonough JE; Palta J
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091710. PubMed ID: 25186385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel pencil beam model for carbon-ion dose calculation derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
Zhang H; Dai Z; Liu X; Chen W; Ma Y; He P; Dai T; Shen G; Yuan P; Li Q
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():15-24. PubMed ID: 30471815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
