286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27908182)
1. Prostate deformation from inflatable rectal probe cover and dosimetric effects in prostate seed implant brachytherapy.
Lian J; Shao Y; Potter LD; Chen RC; Holmes JA; Pryser EA; Shen J; Shen D; Wang AZ
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6569. PubMed ID: 27908182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: seed orientation and the impact of dosimetric anisotropy in stranded implants.
Chng N; Spadinger I; Rasoda R; Morris WJ; Salcudean S
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):721-31. PubMed ID: 22320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric evaluation of MRI-to-ultrasound automated image registration algorithms for prostate brachytherapy.
Shaaer A; Paudel M; Davidson M; Semple M; Nicolae A; Mendez LC; Chung H; Loblaw A; Tseng CL; Morton G; Ravi A
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 32712028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate brachytherapy intraoperative dosimetry using a combination of radiographic seed localization with a C-arm and deformed ultrasound prostate contours.
Golshan M; Mahdavi SS; Samei G; Lobo J; Pickles T; James Morris W; Keyes M; Peacock M; Salcudean SE; Spadinger I
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 32682777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy.
Stone NN; Hong S; Lo YC; Howard V; Stock RG
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 15062159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Real-time intraoperative evaluation of implant quality and dose correction during prostate brachytherapy consistently improves target coverage using a novel image fusion and optimization program.
Zelefsky MJ; Cohen GN; Taggar AS; Kollmeier M; McBride S; Mageras G; Zaider M
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(5):319-324. PubMed ID: 28377139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric impact of interfraction catheter movement in high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy.
Foster W; Cunha JA; Hsu IC; Weinberg V; Krishnamurthy D; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 May; 80(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 20605353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and deformation effects of image-guided interventions during stereotactic body radiation therapy of the prostate using an endorectal balloon.
Jones BL; Gan G; Diot Q; Kavanagh B; Timmerman RD; Miften M
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3080-8. PubMed ID: 22755693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. HDR prostate monotherapy: dosimetric effects of implant deformation due to posture change between TRUS- and CT-imaging.
Seppenwoolde Y; Kolkman-Deurloo IK; Sipkema D; de Langen M; Praag J; Jansen P; Heijmen B
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 18054101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phase II study of intraoperative dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy using registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy.
Lee J; Hobbs RF; Zahurak M; Ng SK; Zhang Z; Burdette EC; DeWeese TL; Song DY
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(6):858-865. PubMed ID: 30217432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric quality and evolution of edema after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for small prostates: implications for the use of newer isotopes.
Kovtun KA; Wolfsberger L; Niedermayr T; Sugar EN; Graham PL; Murciano-Goroff Y; Beard C; D'Amico AV; Martin NE; Orio PF; Nguyen PL
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 23911279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11240263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesion defined by sextant biopsy in a permanent prostate I-125 implant: a prospective comparative toxicity analysis.
Gaudet M; Vigneault E; Aubin S; Varfalvy N; Harel F; Beaulieu L; Martin AG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 May; 77(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 19665322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
