These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27909023)

  • 1. Characterizing Student Perceptions of and Buy-In toward Common Formative Assessment Techniques.
    Brazeal KR; Brown TL; Couch BA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27909023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Student Buy-In Toward Formative Assessments: The Influence of Student Factors and Importance for Course Success.
    Brazeal KR; Couch BA
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2017 Apr; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28512523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alignment of learning objectives, assessments, and active learning to promote critical thinking in a first-year medical physiology course: lessons learned.
    Anderson LC; Fernandez-Branson C
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2024 Jun; 48(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 38511215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Access to Online Formative Assessments in Lower-Division Undergraduate Biology Courses: Investigating Barriers to Student Engagement.
    Upchurch AM; Kirkwood-Watts DL; Brazeal KR; Wheeler LA; Couch BA; Johnson GB; Spier SK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 21(4):ar80. PubMed ID: 36264769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment to Optimize Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions.
    Wlodarczyk S; Muller-Juge V; Hauer KE; Tong MS; Ransohoff A; Boscardin C
    Teach Learn Med; 2021; 33(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 33439035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.
    Bullock JL; Seligman L; Lai CJ; O'Sullivan PS; Hauer KE
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 34014793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowing is half the battle: Assessments of both student perception and performance are necessary to successfully evaluate curricular transformation.
    Shaw TJ; Yang S; Nash TR; Pigg RM; Grim JM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210030. PubMed ID: 30633765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Online feedback assessments in physiology: effects on students' learning experiences and outcomes.
    Marden NY; Ulman LG; Wilson FS; Velan GM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2013 Jun; 37(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 23728137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Students' perceptions of a near-peer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in medical imaging.
    Taylor D; Quick S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31902454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of Student Learning Gains in High- and Low-Tech Active-Learning Environments.
    Soneral PA; Wyse SA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28213582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Academic Performance, Belonging, and Retention through Increasing Structure of an Introductory Biology Course.
    Wilton M; Gonzalez-Niño E; McPartlan P; Terner Z; Christoffersen RE; Rothman JH
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Dec; 18(4):ar53. PubMed ID: 31675276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmacy students' perceptions toward peer assessment and its use in teaching patient presentation skills.
    Han Z; Chan A
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 Feb; 12(2):228-236. PubMed ID: 32147166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The benefits of using clickers in small-enrollment seminar-style biology courses.
    Smith MK; Trujillo C; Su TT
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 21364096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment as Learning in Medical Education: Feasibility and Perceived Impact of Student-Generated Formative Assessments.
    Lakhtakia R; Otaki F; Alsuwaidi L; Zary N
    JMIR Med Educ; 2022 Jul; 8(3):e35820. PubMed ID: 35867379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student anxiety in introductory biology classrooms: Perceptions about active learning and persistence in the major.
    England BJ; Brigati JR; Schussler EE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182506. PubMed ID: 28771564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient undergraduate learning of liver transplant: building a framework for teaching subspecialties to medical students.
    Ho CM; Wang JY; Yeh CC; Wu YM; Ho MC; Hu RH; Lee PH
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Jul; 18(1):161. PubMed ID: 29973216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First-Year and Non-First-Year Student Expectations Regarding In-Class and Out-of-Class Learning Activities in Introductory Biology.
    Brown TL; Brazeal KR; Couch BA
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2017 Apr; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28512514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.