These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 279096)

  • 1. [Class II--sagittal dimension].
    Grobéty D; Pfeiffer JP; Joho JP
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1978 Aug; 88(8):890-905. PubMed ID: 279096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential diagnosis of skeletal open bite based on sagittal components of the face.
    Arat ZM; Işeri H; Arman A
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 15794041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age.
    McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 1981 Jul; 51(3):177-202. PubMed ID: 7023290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study.
    Baccetti T; Antonini A; Franchi L; Tonti M; Tollaro I
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9088604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children.
    Pancherz H; Zieber K; Hoyer B
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 9107375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Proposal for a classification of Class II Division 1: contribution of Delaire's analysis].
    Le Guédard-Girault I; Bédhet N; Manière-Ezvan A; Delaire J
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Dec; 71(4):267-76. PubMed ID: 11196225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III.
    D'Attilio M; Caputi S; Epifania E; Festa F; Tecco S
    Cranio; 2005 Jul; 23(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16128357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Contribution of three dimensional cephalometry in the study of determining morphological parameters for facial esthetics].
    Zribi A; Faure J
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Mar; 85(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 24685249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sagittal and vertical effects of transverse sagittal maxillary expander (TSME) in three different malocclusion groups.
    Maspero C; Galbiati G; Giannini L; Farronato G
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Apr; 16():6. PubMed ID: 25907431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.