These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27909981)

  • 1. The effect of working memory load on the SNARC effect: Maybe tasks have a word to say.
    Deng Z; Chen Y; Zhu X; Li Y
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):428-441. PubMed ID: 27909981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task.
    van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Fias W
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 19726035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of semantic processing and response latency on the SNARC effect.
    Didino D; Breil C; Knops A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 May; 196():75-86. PubMed ID: 31004938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It does exist! A left-to-right spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect among native Hebrew speakers.
    Zohar-Shai B; Tzelgov J; Karni A; Rubinsten O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):719-728. PubMed ID: 28182477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNARC struggles: Instant control over spatial-numerical associations.
    Pfister R; Schroeder PA; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23647378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of number-space associations: SNARC effects and spatial attention in 7- to 11-year-olds.
    Pan Y; Han X; Mei G; Bai X; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212204. PubMed ID: 30861008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. There is more than "more is up": Hand and foot responses reverse the vertical association of number magnitudes.
    Hartmann M; Gashaj V; Stahnke A; Mast FW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1401-14. PubMed ID: 24749934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-symbolic magnitudes are represented spatially: Evidence from a non-symbolic SNARC task.
    Nemeh F; Humberstone J; Yates MJ; Reeve RA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203019. PubMed ID: 30161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial attention.
    van Dijck JP; Abrahamse EL; Acar F; Ketels B; Fias W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1500-13. PubMed ID: 24749504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Key Distance to Clarify a Theory on the SNARC.
    Schiller F; Eloka O; Franz VH
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):196-221. PubMed ID: 26822868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prefrontal neuromodulation reverses spatial associations of non-numerical sequences, but not numbers.
    Schroeder PA; Nuerk HC; Plewnia C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Sep; 128():39-49. PubMed ID: 28733256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probing the Dual-Route Model of the SNARC Effect by Orthogonalizing Processing Speed and Depth.
    Didino D; Brandtner M; Glaser M; Knops A
    Exp Psychol; 2023 Jan; 70(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 37039504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of cognitive appraisal and mental workload factors on performance in an arithmetic task.
    Galy E; Mélan C
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2015 Dec; 40(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 26205469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing stage flexibility of the SNARC effect: Task relevance or magnitude relevance?
    Xiang X; Yan L; Fu S; Nan W
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1022999. PubMed ID: 36438366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of working memory contents and perceptual load on distractor processing: When a response-related distractor is held in working memory.
    Koshino H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():19-25. PubMed ID: 27838400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SNARC meets SPARC in fMRI--Interdependence of compatibility effects depends on semantic content.
    Weis T; Estner B; Krick CM; Reith W; Lachmann T
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():331-8. PubMed ID: 26382748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.