These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27912142)
1. How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation. Karimi M; Brazier J; Paisley S Soc Sci Med; 2017 Jan; 172():80-88. PubMed ID: 27912142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are preferences over health states informed? Karimi M; Brazier J; Paisley S Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):105. PubMed ID: 28521836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L. Åström M; Conte H; Berg J; Burström K Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 35201557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values? Mulhern B; Shah K; Janssen MF; Longworth L; Ibbotson R Value Health; 2016; 19(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 27021755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of composite time trade-off and discrete choice experiment methods for the valuation of the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): a think-aloud study. Yiu HHE; Al-Janabi H; Stewart-Brown S; Petrou S; Madan J Qual Life Res; 2022 Sep; 31(9):2739-2751. PubMed ID: 35322304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Reflection and Deliberation on Health State Values: A Mixed-Methods Study. Karimi M; Brazier J; Paisley S Value Health; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31708069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How important is health status in defining quality of life for older people? An exploratory study of the views of older South Australians. Milte CM; Walker R; Luszcz MA; Lancsar E; Kaambwa B; Ratcliffe J Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2014 Feb; 12(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 24254996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing child and adolescent health: a qualitative study on different perspectives and priorities taken by the adult general public. Powell PA; Rowen D; Rivero-Arias O; Tsuchiya A; Brazier JE Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Sep; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 34556133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'The ICECAP-SCM tells you more about what I'm going through': A think-aloud study measuring quality of life among patients receiving supportive and palliative care. Bailey C; Kinghorn P; Orlando R; Armour K; Perry R; Jones L; Coast J Palliat Med; 2016 Jul; 30(7):642-52. PubMed ID: 26819326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Non-health Outcomes: A Person Trade-Off Study in the Context of Genomics. Sheen D; Peasgood T; Goranitis I Clin Ther; 2023 Aug; 45(8):710-718. PubMed ID: 37524571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is bad living better than good death? Impact of demographic and cultural factors on health state preference. Jin X; Liu GG; Luo N; Li H; Guan H; Xie F Qual Life Res; 2016 Apr; 25(4):979-86. PubMed ID: 26346987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hypothetical versus experienced health state valuation: a qualitative study of adult general public views and preferences. Powell PA; Karimi M; Rowen D; Devlin N; van Hout B; Brazier JE Qual Life Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1187-1197. PubMed ID: 36422771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies. Shah K; Mulhern B; Longworth L; Janssen MF Value Health; 2016 Jan; 19(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 26797236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O in an older post-acute patient population relative to the general population. Couzner L; Crotty M; Norman R; Ratcliffe J Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 23807538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Oppe M; Devlin NJ; van Hout B; Krabbe PF; de Charro F Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24969006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seeking serenity: living with HIV/AIDS in rural Western Canada. Groft JN; Robinson Vollman A Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(2):677. PubMed ID: 17516839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states. Lamers LM; Stalmeier PF; Krabbe PF; Busschbach JJ Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16525171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China. Luo N; Liu G; Li M; Guan H; Jin X; Rand-Hendriksen K Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):662-669. PubMed ID: 28408009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning effects in time trade-off based valuation of EQ-5D health states. Augestad LA; Rand-Hendriksen K; Kristiansen IS; Stavem K Value Health; 2012; 15(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 22433766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: a social value set for Latin Americans. Zarate V; Kind P; Chuang LH Value Health; 2008 Dec; 11(7):1170-7. PubMed ID: 18489516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]