129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27912906)
1. Patient and provider factors associated with endometrial Pipelle sampling failure.
Adambekov S; Goughnour SL; Mansuria S; Donnellan N; Elishaev E; Villanueva HJ; Edwards RP; Bovbjerg DH; Linkov F
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):324-328. PubMed ID: 27912906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors for Unsuccessful Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy: A Comparative Study of Office-Based Endometrial Biopsy (Pipelle) and Diagnostic Dilation and Curettage.
Xie B; Qian C; Yang B; Ning C; Yao X; Du Y; Shi Y; Luo X; Chen X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):724-729. PubMed ID: 29223698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound examination of the endometrium before and after Pipelle endometrial sampling.
Van den Bosch T; Van Schoubroeck D; Ameye L; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 26(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 16082721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is pipelle biopsy really adequate for diagnosing endometrial disease?
Tanriverdi HA; Barut A; Gün BD; Kaya E
Med Sci Monit; 2004 Jun; 10(6):CR271-4. PubMed ID: 15173672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pipelle biopsy and dilatation and curettage in clinical practice: are factors affecting their effectiveness the same?
Piatek S; Warzecha D; Kisielewski F; Szymusik I; Panek G; Wielgos M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Mar; 45(3):645-651. PubMed ID: 30548369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The safety and acceptability of Pipelle endometrial sampling in premenopausal women in comparison to postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Rezk M; Dawood R; Masood A
Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Oct; 68(5):492-6. PubMed ID: 27430200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of endometrial Pipelle sampling with and without sonographic measurement of endometrial thickness.
Goldchmit R; Katz Z; Blickstein I; Caspi B; Dgani R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 82(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 8414316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multicenter study comparing two endometrial sampling devices--Medscand Endorette and Pipelle de Cornier.
Moberger B; Nilsson S; Palmstierna S; Redvall L; Sternby N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):764-9. PubMed ID: 9740526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pipelle endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding: do patient's pain and anxiety really impact on sampling success rate?
Kaiyrlykyzy A; Linkov F; Foster F; Bapayeva G; Ukybassova T; Aimagambetova G; Kenbayeva K; Ibrayimov B; Lyasova A; Terzic M
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Nov; 21(1):393. PubMed ID: 34772384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pipelle endometrial sampling success rates in Kazakhstani settings: results from a prospective cohort analysis.
Terzic M; Aimagambetova G; Bapayeva G; Ukybassova T; Kenbayeva K; Kaiyrlykyzy A; Ibrayimov B; Lyasova A; Terzic S; Alkatout I; Gitas G; Hortu İ; Garzon S; Laganà AS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jul; 42(5):1255-1260. PubMed ID: 34592892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of biopsy strategies for endometrial cancer diagnosis in women with postmenopausal bleeding: Pipelle sampling curette versus dilatation & curettage.
Yi Y; Bryce CL; Adambekov S; Edwards RP; Goughnour SL; Linkov F
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 29747864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of vaginal ultrasonography and pipelle sampling in the diagnosis of endometrial disease.
Kavak Z; Ceyhan N; Pekin S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Feb; 36(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8775255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors attributing to the failure of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding.
Visser NC; Breijer MC; Herman MC; Bekkers RL; Veersema S; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Timmermans A; Pijnenborg JM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Oct; 92(10):1216-22. PubMed ID: 23808392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphological study of Pipelle biopsy specimens in cases of abnormal uterine bleeding.
Khadim MT; Zehra T; Ashraf HM
J Pak Med Assoc; 2015 Jul; 65(7):705-9. PubMed ID: 26160077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of endometrial polyps in Pipelle aspiration sampling: a histopathological study of 195 cases.
Seto MT; Ip PP; Ngu SF; Cheung AN; Pun TC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():12-5. PubMed ID: 27219202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outpatient endometrial biopsy with Pipelle vs diagnostic dilatation and curettage.
Rauf R; Shaheen A; Sadia S; Waqar F; Zafar S; Sultana S; Waseem S
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2014; 26(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 25603664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
