These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27913026)

  • 1. Assessing membrane fouling and the performance of pilot-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) to treat real municipal wastewater during winter season in Nordic regions.
    Gurung K; Ncibi MC; Sillanpää M
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 579():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 27913026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removal properties of human enteric viruses in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) process.
    Miura T; Okabe S; Nakahara Y; Sano D
    Water Res; 2015 May; 75():282-91. PubMed ID: 25770448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in wastewater treatment performance and activated sludge properties of a membrane bioreactor at low temperature operation.
    Zhang C; Wang G; Hu Z
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Sep; 16(9):2199-207. PubMed ID: 25003580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aerobic Granular Sludge-Membrane BioReactor (AGS-MBR) as a Novel Configuration for Wastewater Treatment and Fouling Mitigation: A Mini-Review.
    Campo R; Lubello C; Lotti T; Di Bella G
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33916529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the applicability of the aquatic ascomycete
    Hofmann U; Fenu A; Beffa T; Beimfohr C; Weemaes M; Yu L; Schrader S; Moeder M; Schlosser D
    Eng Life Sci; 2018 Jul; 18(7):510-519. PubMed ID: 32624932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of human adenovirus removal in a full-scale membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Kuo DH; Simmons FJ; Blair S; Hart E; Rose JB; Xagoraraki I
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1520-30. PubMed ID: 19944439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems.
    Hirani ZM; DeCarolis JF; Adham SS; Jacangelo JG
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2431-40. PubMed ID: 20144839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of microbial indicators from municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor (MBR).
    Marti E; Monclús H; Jofre J; Rodriguez-Roda I; Comas J; Balcázar JL
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(8):5004-9. PubMed ID: 21334881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pilot scale study on a new membrane bioreactor hybrid system in municipal wastewater treatment.
    Nguyen TT; Ngo HH; Guo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Aug; 141():8-12. PubMed ID: 23566462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of sludge bulking on membrane fouling of MBR under low temperature].
    Ren NQ; Liu J; Wang XH
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2009 Jan; 30(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 19353874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Operating Conditions on Membrane Fouling in Pilot-Scale MBRs; Filaments Growth, Diminishing Dissolved Oxygen and Recirculation Rate of the Activated Sludge.
    Gkotsis P; Banti D; Pritsa A; Mitrakas M; Samaras P; Peleka E; Zouboulis A
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34210095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
    Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
    Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
    Ping Chu H; Li XY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of metal removal, biomass activity and RO concentrate treatment in an MBR-RO system.
    Malamis S; Katsou E; Takopoulos K; Demetriou P; Loizidou M
    J Hazard Mater; 2012 Mar; 209-210():1-8. PubMed ID: 22209586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of human enteric viruses by a full-scale membrane bioreactor during municipal wastewater processing.
    Simmons FJ; Kuo DH; Xagoraraki I
    Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2739-50. PubMed ID: 21453953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term investigation of a novel electrochemical membrane bioreactor for low-strength municipal wastewater treatment.
    Ma J; Wang Z; He D; Li Y; Wu Z
    Water Res; 2015 Jul; 78():98-110. PubMed ID: 25917391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of a combined system of microbial fuel cell and membrane bioreactor: wastewater treatment, sludge reduction, energy recovery and membrane fouling.
    Su X; Tian Y; Sun Z; Lu Y; Li Z
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2013 Nov; 49():92-8. PubMed ID: 23722047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Performance and Membrane Fouling Characteristics of Mariculture Wastewater Treated by Anoxic MBR-MMR].
    Chen FY; Xu Z; You H; Liu F; Li ZP; Chen QW; Han HW
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2020 Jun; 41(6):2762-2770. PubMed ID: 32608792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of micropollutant removal and fouling reduction in a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor system.
    Luo Y; Jiang Q; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Price WE; Wang J; Guo W
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Sep; 191():355-9. PubMed ID: 26031758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.