These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27913165)

  • 1. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs (
    Feagles O; Höbel G
    Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Moderately elevated glucocorticoids increase mate choosiness but do not affect sexual proceptivity or preferences in female gray treefrogs.
    Baugh AT; Gall MD; Silver SC; Bee MA
    Horm Behav; 2021 Apr; 130():104950. PubMed ID: 33556376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate analysis of genetic variation in the advertisement call of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor.
    Welch AM; Smith MJ; Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 24621402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Ward JL; Love EK; Baugh AT; Gordon NM; Tanner JC; Bee MA
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):280-7. PubMed ID: 26454212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mate choice strategies in a spatially-explicit model environment.
    Ferreira GBS; Scheutz M; Boyd SK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202680. PubMed ID: 30138426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae).
    Gerhardt HC; Martínez-Rivera CC; Schwartz JJ; Marshall VT; Murphy CG
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Sep; 210(Pt 17):2990-8. PubMed ID: 17704074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Context and condition dependent plasticity in sexual signaling in gray treefrogs.
    Kuczynski MC; Gering E; Getty T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Mar; 124():74-9. PubMed ID: 26706029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
    Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females.
    Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC
    Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.
    Höbel G; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 289(1967):20211822. PubMed ID: 35042417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1855-63. PubMed ID: 22817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.