These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27913454)

  • 1. The anti-bat strategy of ultrasound absorption: the wings of nocturnal moths (Bombycoidea: Saturniidae) absorb more ultrasound than the wings of diurnal moths (Chalcosiinae: Zygaenoidea: Zygaenidae).
    Ntelezos A; Guarato F; Windmill JF
    Biol Open; 2017 Jan; 6(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27913454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moth wing scales slightly increase the absorbance of bat echolocation calls.
    Zeng J; Xiang N; Jiang L; Jones G; Zheng Y; Liu B; Zhang S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27190. PubMed ID: 22096534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High duty cycle pulses suppress orientation flights of crambid moths.
    Nakano R; Ihara F; Mishiro K; Toyama M; Toda S
    J Insect Physiol; 2015 Dec; 83():15-21. PubMed ID: 26549128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory sensitivity of Hawaiian moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and selective predation by the Hawaiian hoary bat (Chiroptera: Lasiurus cinereus semotus).
    Fullard JH
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jul; 268(1474):1375-80. PubMed ID: 11429137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thoracic scales of moths as a stealth coating against bat biosonar.
    Neil TR; Shen Z; Robert D; Drinkwater BW; Holderied MW
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Feb; 17(163):20190692. PubMed ID: 32093539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of anti-bat sensory illusions in moths.
    Rubin JJ; Hamilton CA; McClure CJW; Chadwell BA; Kawahara AY; Barber JR
    Sci Adv; 2018 Jul; 4(7):eaar7428. PubMed ID: 29978042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound strategies: the 65-million-year-old battle between bats and insects.
    Conner WE; Corcoran AJ
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2012; 57():21-39. PubMed ID: 21888517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths.
    Rydell J; Skals N; Surlykke A; Svensson M
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Jan; 264(1378):83-8. PubMed ID: 9061963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.
    Barber JR; Leavell BC; Keener AL; Breinholt JW; Chadwell BA; McClure CJ; Hill GM; Kawahara AY
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(9):2812-6. PubMed ID: 25730869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense.
    Corcoran AJ; Conner WE
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Dec; 215(Pt 24):4278-87. PubMed ID: 23175526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary escalation: the bat-moth arms race.
    Ter Hofstede HM; Ratcliffe JM
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Jun; 219(Pt 11):1589-602. PubMed ID: 27252453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing bird-driven diurnal trade-offs of the moon moth's anti-bat tail.
    Rubin JJ; Martin NW; Sieving KE; Kawahara AY
    Biol Lett; 2023 Feb; 19(2):20220428. PubMed ID: 36722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tiger moth responses to a simulated bat attack: timing and duty cycle.
    Barber JR; Conner WE
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Jul; 209(Pt 14):2637-50. PubMed ID: 16809455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fine nanostructural variation in the wing pattern of a moth
    Ghosh S; Mishra M
    J Biosci; 2018 Sep; 43(4):673-684. PubMed ID: 30207313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. To females of a noctuid moth, male courtship songs are nothing more than bat echolocation calls.
    Nakano R; Takanashi T; Skals N; Surlykke A; Ishikawa Y
    Biol Lett; 2010 Oct; 6(5):582-4. PubMed ID: 20219743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.
    Kawahara AY; Barber JR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 May; 112(20):6407-12. PubMed ID: 25941377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasonic predator-prey interactions in water-convergent evolution with insects and bats in air?
    Wilson M; Wahlberg M; Surlykke A; Madsen PT
    Front Physiol; 2013; 4():137. PubMed ID: 23781206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deaf moths employ acoustic Müllerian mimicry against bats using wingbeat-powered tymbals.
    O'Reilly LJ; Agassiz DJL; Neil TR; Holderied MW
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1444. PubMed ID: 30723216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tiger moth jams bat sonar.
    Corcoran AJ; Barber JR; Conner WE
    Science; 2009 Jul; 325(5938):325-7. PubMed ID: 19608920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.
    Hristov NI; Conner WE
    Naturwissenschaften; 2005 Apr; 92(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 15772807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.