These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27913617)

  • 1. Evaluating Sequence-Based Genomic Prediction with an Efficient New Simulator.
    Pérez-Enciso M; Forneris N; de Los Campos G; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2017 Feb; 205(2):939-953. PubMed ID: 27913617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. pSBVB: A Versatile Simulation Tool To Evaluate Genomic Selection in Polyploid Species.
    Zingaretti ML; Monfort A; Pérez-Enciso M
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Feb; 9(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 30573468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A combined coalescence gene-dropping tool for evaluating genomic selection in complex scenarios (ms2gs).
    Pérez-Enciso M; Legarra A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Apr; 133(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 26995218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geno-Diver: A combined coalescence and forward-in-time simulator for populations undergoing selection for complex traits.
    Howard JT; Tiezzi F; Pryce JE; Maltecca C
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Dec; 134(6):553-563. PubMed ID: 28464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Sequence Variants in Linkage Disequilibrium with Causative Mutations to Improve Across-Breed Prediction in Dairy Cattle: A Simulation Study.
    van den Berg I; Boichard D; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2553-61. PubMed ID: 27317779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physiology and Endocrinology Symposium: How single nucleotide polymorphism chips will advance our knowledge of factors controlling puberty and aid in selecting replacement beef females.
    Snelling WM; Cushman RA; Fortes MR; Reverter A; Bennett GL; Keele JW; Kuehn LA; McDaneld TG; Thallman RM; Thomas MG
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1152-65. PubMed ID: 22038989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotyping by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing in intercross pedigrees from outbred founders: a cost-efficient approach.
    Zan Y; Payen T; Lillie M; Honaker CF; Siegel PB; Carlborg Ö
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):44. PubMed ID: 31412777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
    Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design of a low-density SNP chip for the main Australian sheep breeds and its effect on imputation and genomic prediction accuracy.
    Bolormaa S; Gore K; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ; Daetwyler HD
    Anim Genet; 2015 Oct; 46(5):544-56. PubMed ID: 26360638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GeneEvolve: a fast and memory efficient forward-time simulator of realistic whole-genome sequence and SNP data.
    Tahmasbi R; Keller MC
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):294-296. PubMed ID: 27659450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic relationships computed from either next-generation sequence or array SNP data.
    Pérez-Enciso M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Apr; 131(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 24397314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle.
    Mujibi FD; Nkrumah JD; Durunna ON; Stothard P; Mah J; Wang Z; Basarab J; Plastow G; Crews DH; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 21642493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.