211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27913774)
1. Gravity Flow in Proposed Enteral Tube Small-Bore Connectors.
Hurt RT; Epp LM; Pattinson AK; Duellman WM; Corner SM; Mundi MS
Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Apr; 32(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 27913774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Gravity Flow Rates Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Mar; 42(3):522-528. PubMed ID: 28406738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased Force Required With Proposed Standardized Enteral Feed Connector in Blenderized Tube Feeding.
Mundi MS; Epp L; Hurt RT
Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):795-798. PubMed ID: 27091746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of International Proposed Standardized Enteral Connector for Semi-Solid Formula Feeding.
Maruyama M; Iijima S; Ishibashi N; Inukai M; Oriishi T; Kawasaki N; Kurata N; Suzuki Y; Tabei I; Chiba M; Nakamura E; Higashiguchi T
Ann Nutr Metab; 2018; 73(3):169-176. PubMed ID: 30179861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Syringe Compression Force Between ENFit and Legacy Feeding Tubes.
Mundi MS; Duellman W; Epp L; Davidson J; Hurt RT
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Jan; 43(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 29846003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Design Changes in Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) Devices for Patients Who Rely on Home-Based Blenderized Diets for Enteral Nutrition.
Guha S; Bouhrira N; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
J Am Coll Nutr; 2019; 38(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 30821589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesis of research on ENFit gastrostomy tubes with potential implications for US patients using these devices.
Guha S; Herman A; Antonino M; Silverstein JS; Venkataraman-Rao P; Myers MR
Nutr Clin Pract; 2022 Aug; 37(4):752-761. PubMed ID: 35165940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In Vitro Performance Testing of Legacy and ENFit Gastrostomy Tube Devices Under Gravity Flow Conditions.
Guha S; Ravi N; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2018 Nov; 42(8):1334-1341. PubMed ID: 29701924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [INFLUENCE OF THE NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF DIFFERENT FIBER-ENRICHED ENTERAL NUTRITION FORMULAS ON THE ADMINISTRATION TIME BY GRAVITY AND THE RISK OF TUBE FEEDING OBSTRUCTION].
Bonada Sanjaume A; Gils Contreras A; Salas-Salvadó J
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Aug; 32(2):683-90. PubMed ID: 26268099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ENFit Enteral Nutrition Connectors.
Guenter P; Lyman B
Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):769-772. PubMed ID: 27756849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viscosity and flow-rate of three high-energy, high-fibre enteral nutrition formulas.
Casas-Augustench P; Salas-Salvadó J
Nutr Hosp; 2009; 24(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 19721931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. TJC: plan and prepare for the transition to new tubing connectors to minimize the risk of dangerous misconnections, clinician frustration.
ED Manag; 2014 Dec; 26(12):Suppl 1-3. PubMed ID: 25522497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing dosing errors in legacy and low dose tip ENFit
Guha S; Niswander W; Herman A; Antonino MJ; Venkataraman Rao P; White K; Haugen S; Vesnovsky O
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2022 Feb; 47(2):218-227. PubMed ID: 34713903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ENFit Enteral Nutrition Connectors: Benefits and Challenges.
Guenter P; Lyman B
Nutr Clin Pract; 2016 Dec; 31(6):769-772. PubMed ID: 29932273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Home Enteral Nutrition: Updates, Trends, and Challenges.
Martin K; Gardner G
Nutr Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 32(6):712-721. PubMed ID: 28437132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-sectional Evaluation of Home Enteral Nutrition Practice in the United States in the Context of the New Enteral Connectors.
Epp LM; Salonen BR; Hurt RT; Mundi MS
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 2019 Nov; 43(8):1020-1027. PubMed ID: 30729551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pilot study evaluating the efficacy, tolerance and safety of a peptide-based enteral formula versus a high protein enteral formula in multiple ICU settings (medical, surgical, cardiothoracic).
Seres DS; Ippolito PR
Clin Nutr; 2017 Jun; 36(3):706-709. PubMed ID: 27161892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New options for pumps and tubes: progress in enteral feeding techniques and devices.
Varella LD; Young RJ
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 1999 Jul; 2(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 10453305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing Delivery of Breast Milk for Premature Infants: Comparison of Current Enteral Feeding Systems.
Abdelrahman K; Jarjour J; Hagan J; Yang H; Sutton D; Hair A
Nutr Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 35(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 31713294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical considerations for medical device manufacturers when designing gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) using the new ISO 80369-3 connector.
Guha S; Herman A; Herbertson L; Antonino MJ; Silverstein JS; Cooper J; Myers MR
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236644. PubMed ID: 32730360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
