These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914044)

  • 1. The Framework of Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():3-19. PubMed ID: 27914044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achievements and Challenges in Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():21-94. PubMed ID: 27914045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():161-179. PubMed ID: 27914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deterministic Search Methods for Computational Protein Design.
    Traoré S; Allouche D; André I; Schiex T; Barbe S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():107-123. PubMed ID: 27914047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. rstoolbox - a Python library for large-scale analysis of computational protein design data and structural bioinformatics.
    Bonet J; Harteveld Z; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Correia BE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):240. PubMed ID: 31092198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational protein design for given backbone: recent progresses in general method-related aspects.
    Liu H; Chen Q
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2016 Aug; 39():89-95. PubMed ID: 27348345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational protein design with backbone plasticity.
    MacDonald JT; Freemont PS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2016 Oct; 44(5):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 27911735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progress in computational protein design.
    Lippow SM; Tidor B
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17644370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advances in computational protein design.
    Park S; Yang X; Saven JG
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Aug; 14(4):487-94. PubMed ID: 15313244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of Normal Mode Analysis Methods in Computational Protein Design.
    Frappier V; Chartier M; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():203-214. PubMed ID: 27914052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new framework for computational protein design through cost function network optimization.
    Traoré S; Allouche D; André I; de Givry S; Katsirelos G; Schiex T; Barbe S
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 29(17):2129-36. PubMed ID: 23842814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational design of a leucine-rich repeat protein with a predefined geometry.
    Rämisch S; Weininger U; Martinsson J; Akke M; André I
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Dec; 111(50):17875-80. PubMed ID: 25427795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rosetta FunFolDes - A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins.
    Bonet J; Wehrle S; Schriever K; Yang C; Billet A; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Sverrisson F; Veselkova B; Vollers S; Lourman R; Villard M; Rosset S; Krey T; Correia BE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006623. PubMed ID: 30452434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Challenges in the computational design of proteins.
    Suárez M; Jaramillo A
    J R Soc Interface; 2009 Aug; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S477-91. PubMed ID: 19324680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OSPREY Predicts Resistance Mutations Using Positive and Negative Computational Protein Design.
    Ojewole A; Lowegard A; Gainza P; Reeve SM; Georgiev I; Anderson AC; Donald BR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():291-306. PubMed ID: 27914058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general-purpose protein design framework based on mining sequence-structure relationships in known protein structures.
    Zhou J; Panaitiu AE; Grigoryan G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(2):1059-1068. PubMed ID: 31892539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current updates on computer aided protein modeling and designing.
    Khan FI; Wei DQ; Gu KR; Hassan MI; Tabrez S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2016 Apr; 85():48-62. PubMed ID: 26730484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parallel Computational Protein Design.
    Zhou Y; Donald BR; Zeng J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():265-277. PubMed ID: 27914056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins.
    Tinberg CE; Khare SD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():363-373. PubMed ID: 27914062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.