These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914044)
21. Can computationally designed protein sequences improve secondary structure prediction? Bondugula R; Wallqvist A; Lee MS Protein Eng Des Sel; 2011 May; 24(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 21282334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computational protein design-the next generation tool to expand synthetic biology applications. Gainza-Cirauqui P; Correia BE Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2018 Aug; 52():145-152. PubMed ID: 29729544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computational protein design: a novel path to future protein drugs. Rosenberg M; Goldblum A Curr Pharm Des; 2006; 12(31):3973-97. PubMed ID: 17100608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data driven flexible backbone protein design. Sun MGF; Kim PM PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 13(8):e1005722. PubMed ID: 28837553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Protein design in biological networks: from manipulating the input to modifying the output. Van der Sloot AM; Kiel C; Serrano L; Stricher F Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):537-42. PubMed ID: 19574296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. EpiSweep: Computationally Driven Reengineering of Therapeutic Proteins to Reduce Immunogenicity While Maintaining Function. Choi Y; Verma D; Griswold KE; Bailey-Kellogg C Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():375-398. PubMed ID: 27914063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization. Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computational protein design promises to revolutionize protein engineering. Alvizo O; Allen BD; Mayo SL Biotechniques; 2007 Jan; 42(1):31, 33, 35 passim. PubMed ID: 17269482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combinatorial protein design strategies using computational methods. Kono H; Wang W; Saven JG Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 352():3-22. PubMed ID: 17041256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design. Löffler P; Schmitz S; Hupfeld E; Sterner R; Merkl R PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 13(6):e1005600. PubMed ID: 28604768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Modeling Binding Affinity of Pathological Mutations for Computational Protein Design. Romero-Durana M; Pallara C; Glaser F; Fernández-Recio J Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():139-159. PubMed ID: 27914049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computational protein design with electrostatic focusing: experimental characterization of a conditionally folded helical domain with a reduced amino acid alphabet. Suárez-Diez M; Pujol AM; Matzapetakis M; Jaramillo A; Iranzo O Biotechnol J; 2013 Jul; 8(7):855-64. PubMed ID: 23788466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evolution-Inspired Computational Design of Symmetric Proteins. Voet AR; Simoncini D; Tame JR; Zhang KY Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():309-322. PubMed ID: 27914059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exploring folding free energy landscapes using computational protein design. Kuhlman B; Baker D Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Feb; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15102454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A fast and precise approach for computational saturation mutagenesis and its experimental validation by using an artificial (βα)8-barrel protein. Fischer A; Seitz T; Lochner A; Sterner R; Merkl R; Bocola M Chembiochem; 2011 Jul; 12(10):1544-50. PubMed ID: 21626637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effective scoring function for protein sequence design. Liang S; Grishin NV Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):271-81. PubMed ID: 14696189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]