These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914052)

  • 1. Applications of Normal Mode Analysis Methods in Computational Protein Design.
    Frappier V; Chartier M; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():203-214. PubMed ID: 27914052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrational entropy differences between mesophile and thermophile proteins and their use in protein engineering.
    Frappier V; Najmanovich R
    Protein Sci; 2015 Apr; 24(4):474-83. PubMed ID: 25367089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of Molecular Dynamics Based Predictions into the Optimization of De Novo Protein Designs: Limitations and Benefits.
    Carvalho HF; Barbosa AJ; Roque AC; Iranzo O; Branco RJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():181-201. PubMed ID: 27914051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization.
    Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ENCoM server: exploring protein conformational space and the effect of mutations on protein function and stability.
    Frappier V; Chartier M; Najmanovich RJ
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W395-400. PubMed ID: 25883149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():161-179. PubMed ID: 27914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. OSPREY Predicts Resistance Mutations Using Positive and Negative Computational Protein Design.
    Ojewole A; Lowegard A; Gainza P; Reeve SM; Georgiev I; Anderson AC; Donald BR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():291-306. PubMed ID: 27914058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A coarse-grained elastic network atom contact model and its use in the simulation of protein dynamics and the prediction of the effect of mutations.
    Frappier V; Najmanovich RJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Apr; 10(4):e1003569. PubMed ID: 24762569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling Binding Affinity of Pathological Mutations for Computational Protein Design.
    Romero-Durana M; Pallara C; Glaser F; Fernández-Recio J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():139-159. PubMed ID: 27914049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computational Protein Design Under a Given Backbone Structure with the ABACUS Statistical Energy Function.
    Xiong P; Chen Q; Liu H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():217-226. PubMed ID: 27914053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details.
    Potapov V; Cohen M; Schreiber G
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):553-60. PubMed ID: 19561092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EpiSweep: Computationally Driven Reengineering of Therapeutic Proteins to Reduce Immunogenicity While Maintaining Function.
    Choi Y; Verma D; Griswold KE; Bailey-Kellogg C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():375-398. PubMed ID: 27914063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring Protein Supersecondary Structure Through Changes in Protein Folding, Stability, and Flexibility.
    Pires DEV; Rodrigues CHM; Albanaz ATS; Karmakar M; Myung Y; Xavier J; Michanetzi EM; Portelli S; Ascher DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():173-185. PubMed ID: 30945219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current updates on computer aided protein modeling and designing.
    Khan FI; Wei DQ; Gu KR; Hassan MI; Tabrez S
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2016 Apr; 85():48-62. PubMed ID: 26730484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolution-Inspired Computational Design of Symmetric Proteins.
    Voet AR; Simoncini D; Tame JR; Zhang KY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():309-322. PubMed ID: 27914059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational Tools for Aiding Rational Antibody Design.
    Krawczyk K; Dunbar J; Deane CM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():399-416. PubMed ID: 27914064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Engineering protein therapeutics: predictive performances of a structure-based virtual affinity maturation protocol.
    Oberlin M; Kroemer R; Mikol V; Minoux H; Tastan E; Baurin N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug; 52(8):2204-14. PubMed ID: 22788756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of Protein Interactions by Structural Matching: Prediction of PPI Networks and the Effects of Mutations on PPIs that Combines Sequence and Structural Information.
    Tuncbag N; Keskin O; Nussinov R; Gursoy A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1558():255-270. PubMed ID: 28150242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing cooperativity into the designed protein Top7.
    Yadahalli S; Gosavi S
    Proteins; 2014 Mar; 82(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 23966061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of mode analyses at different resolutions applied to nucleic acid systems.
    Van Wynsberghe AW; Cui Q
    Biophys J; 2005 Nov; 89(5):2939-49. PubMed ID: 16100266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.