These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914094)

  • 1. Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27914094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space.
    Kelly JW; Donaldson LS; Sjolund LA; Freiberg JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1473-85. PubMed ID: 23839015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the mechanisms underlying improved distance judgments in virtual environments.
    Kunz BR; Creem-Regehr SH
    Perception; 2015; 44(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 26492729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rescaling of perceived space transfers across virtual environments.
    Siegel ZD; Kelly JW; Cherep LA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1805-1814. PubMed ID: 28967784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frontal extents in virtual environments are not immune to underperception.
    Kelly JW; Hammel W; Sjolund LA; Siegel ZD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 26105656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of viewing plane on perceived distances in real and virtual environments.
    Geuss MN; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH; Thompson WB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 22409144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects.
    Kenyon RV; Phenany M; Sandin D; Defanti T
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 36(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 18066664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: a comparison of verbal reports and blind walking.
    Kunz BR; Wouters L; Smith D; Thompson WB; Creem-Regehr SH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1284-93. PubMed ID: 19633344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recalibration of perceived distance in virtual environments occurs rapidly and transfers asymmetrically across scale.
    Kelly JW; Hammel WW; Siegel ZD; Sjolund LA
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Apr; 20(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 24650986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between the body and the environment in the virtual world: The interpupillary distance affects the body size perception.
    Mine D; Ogawa N; Narumi T; Yokosawa K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232290. PubMed ID: 32330199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulating perception versus action in recalibration tasks.
    Ziemer CJ; Branson MJ; Chihak BJ; Kearney JK; Cremer JF; Plumert JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1260-74. PubMed ID: 23715972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users' distance estimates.
    Richardson AR; Waller D
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):507-17. PubMed ID: 17552313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual distance estimation in static compared to moving virtual scenes.
    Frenz H; Lappe M
    Span J Psychol; 2006 Nov; 9(2):321-31. PubMed ID: 17120711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays.
    Woldegiorgis BH; Lin CJ; Liang WZ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jan; 62(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 30235062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impossible spaces: maximizing natural walking in virtual environments with self-overlapping architecture.
    Suma EA; Lipps Z; Finkelstein S; Krum DM; Bolas M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):555-64. PubMed ID: 22402682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring egocentric distance perception in virtual reality: Influence of methodologies, locomotion and translation gains.
    Maruhn P; Schneider S; Bengler K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0224651. PubMed ID: 31671138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does size matter?
    Sousa R; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    Perception; 2012; 41(12):1532-4. PubMed ID: 23586291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tuning self-motion perception in virtual reality with visual illusions.
    Bruder G; Steinicke F; Wieland P; Lappe M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1068-78. PubMed ID: 22084144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mirror vision: perceived size and perceived distance of virtual images.
    Higashiyama A; Shimono K
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 May; 66(4):679-91. PubMed ID: 15311666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information.
    Waller D; Richardson AR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 18377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.