BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914370)

  • 1. Concurrent measures of contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and of auditory steady-state responses.
    Mertes IB; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):2027. PubMed ID: 27914370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Olivocochlear Efferent Activity Is Associated With the Slope of the Psychometric Function of Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Mertes IB; Wilbanks EC; Leek MR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 29135685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contralateral noise effects on otoacoustic emissions and electrophysiologic responses in normal-hearing adults.
    Mertes IB; Potocki ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):2255. PubMed ID: 35364945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Mertes IB; Goodman SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e72-84. PubMed ID: 26583481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the Presence of Spontaneous Components Affect the Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions?
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 33480622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
    Stuart A; Preast JL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults.
    Stuart A; Butler AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):686-96. PubMed ID: 23072961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Relationship Between Musicianship and Contralateral Suppression of Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Stuart A; Daughtrey ER
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):333-44. PubMed ID: 27115243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor.
    Ferguson MA; O'Donoghue GM; Owen V
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 11409853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects.
    Hood LJ; Berlin CI; Hurley A; Cecola RP; Bell B
    Hear Res; 1996 Nov; 101(1-2):113-8. PubMed ID: 8951438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 60(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 33084414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of measures of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with contralateral suppression.
    Stuart A; Cobb KM
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():35-42. PubMed ID: 26431768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the olivocochlear efferent reflex strength in the susceptibility to temporary hearing deterioration after music exposure in young adults.
    Hannah K; Ingeborg D; Leen M; Annelies B; Birgit P; Freya S; Bart V
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):108-15. PubMed ID: 24804715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions declines with age: a comparison of findings in CBA mice with human listeners.
    Jacobson M; Kim S; Romney J; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1707-13. PubMed ID: 14520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of cochlear active mechanisms in tinnitus subjects with normal hearing sensitivity: multiparametric recording of evoked otoacoustic emissions and contralateral suppression.
    Paglialonga A; Del Bo L; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Jun; 37(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 19879078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.