123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914377)
1. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1537. PubMed ID: 27914377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection.
Zhou N; Dong L
Trends Hear; 2017 Jan; 21():2331216517690108. PubMed ID: 28150534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.
Zhou N; Kraft CT; Colesa DJ; Pfingst BE
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 25990549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Stimulation Mode.
Zhou N; Dong L; Hang M
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 29086155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL70-5. PubMed ID: 27036290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.
Zhou N; Xu L; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):25-32. PubMed ID: 22245714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.
Garadat SN; Colesa DJ; Swiderski DL; Raphael Y; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 2022 Feb; 414():108404. PubMed ID: 34883366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
Zhou N
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.
Pfingst BE; Colesa DJ; Hembrador S; Kang SY; Middlebrooks JC; Raphael Y; Su GL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):3954-68. PubMed ID: 22225050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration.
Pfingst BE; DeHaan DR; Holloway LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1857-66. PubMed ID: 1960279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.
Brochier T; Guérit F; Deeks JM; Garcia C; Bance M; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Feb; 22(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 33150541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.
Bierer JA; Bierer SM; Middlebrooks JC
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):134-42. PubMed ID: 20727397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users.
Padilla M; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():98-107. PubMed ID: 26778546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.
Chatterjee M; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 16270234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.
Adel Y; Hilkhuysen G; Noreña A; Cazals Y; Roman S; Macherey O
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):495-512. PubMed ID: 28224320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
