These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914441)

  • 1. Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1949. PubMed ID: 27914441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Blankenship CM; Garinis AC; Putterman DB; Wróblewski M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():117-139. PubMed ID: 30409510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Clinically Viable Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Assay Using Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Marshall L; Perez ZD; Villabona T
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 37475147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.
    Putterman DB; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Garinis AC; Fitzpatrick DF; McMillan GP; Feeney MP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28437273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chirp evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Neumann J; Uppenkamp S; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 1994 Sep; 79(1-2):17-25. PubMed ID: 7806479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.
    Keefe DH; Patrick Feeney M; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Sanford CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):399. PubMed ID: 29390789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):499. PubMed ID: 28147608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans.
    Fobel O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2213-22. PubMed ID: 15532653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moments of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in human ears: group delay and spread, instantaneous frequency and bandwidth.
    Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3319-50. PubMed ID: 23145615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Swept-tone transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Bennett CL; Özdamar Ö
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1833-44. PubMed ID: 20968356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. A comparison with the non-linear method.
    Molenaar DG; Shaw G; Eggermont JJ
    Hear Res; 2000 May; 143(1-2):197-207. PubMed ID: 10771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of click intensity on click-evoked otoacoustic emission waveforms: implications for the origin of emissions.
    Carvalho S; Büki B; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):215-25. PubMed ID: 12527140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years.
    Ferguson MA; Smith PA; Davis AC; Lutman ME
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Level on the Strength and Detectability of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1391-1403. PubMed ID: 30896525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous suppression of tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions--effect of level and presentation paradigm.
    Killan EC; Kapadia S
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 16324810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal nonlinearity revealed by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded to trains of multiple clicks.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12031522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans exposed to noise.
    Moleti A; Sisto R; Lucertini M
    Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):290-5. PubMed ID: 12433419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.