237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914554)
1. Comparative performance of AmpFLSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR amplification kit and QIAGEN® Investigator® IDplex Plus kit.
Mattayat D; Kitpipit T; Phetpeng S; Asawutmangkul W; Thanakiatkrai P
Sci Justice; 2016 Dec; 56(6):468-474. PubMed ID: 27914554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developmental validation of the AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler® Plus PCR Amplification Kit: an established multiplex assay with improved performance.
Wang DY; Chang CW; Lagacé RE; Calandro LM; Hennessy LK
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):453-65. PubMed ID: 22074494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation and comparative analysis of direct amplification of STRs using PowerPlex® 18D and Identifiler® Direct systems.
Myers BA; King JL; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Sep; 6(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 22405516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving DNA data exchange: validation studies on a single 6 dye STR kit with 24 loci.
Martín P; de Simón LF; Luque G; Farfán MJ; Alonso A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():68-78. PubMed ID: 25082138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sensitivity of two recently developed STR multiplexes for the analysis of chimerism after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Odriozola A; Riancho JA; Colorado M; Zarrabeitia MT
Int J Immunogenet; 2013 Apr; 40(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 22594517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler and AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kits in the Kuwaiti population.
Alenizi MA; Goodwin W; Hadi S; Alenizi HH; Altamar KA; Alsikel MS
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):350-2. PubMed ID: 19187459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of quality controls in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ and Investigator® 24plex STR kits with a variety of forensic samples.
Harrel M; Mayes C; Houston R; Holmes AS; Gutierrez R; Hughes S
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102586. PubMed ID: 34530399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the AMPFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit for use in forensic casework*.
Luce C; Montpetit S; Gangitano D; O'Donnell P
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):1046-54. PubMed ID: 19656255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison Among Three Multiplex Y-STR Profiling Kits for Sexual Assault Cases.
Ferreira-Silva B; Fonseca-Cardoso M; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1836-1840. PubMed ID: 29464703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between DNA degradation ratios and the number of loci detectable by STR kits in extremely old seminal stain samples.
Hara M; Nakanishi H; Takahashi S; Nagai A; Yamamoto T; Yoneyama K; Saito K; Takada A
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Sep; 17(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 26054579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative sensitivity and inhibitor tolerance of GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification and Investigator® 24plex QS kits for challenging samples.
Elwick K; Mayes C; Hughes-Stamm S
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():31-36. PubMed ID: 29501858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction of stutter ratios in short tandem repeat loci typing of low copy number DNA samples.
Seo SB; Ge J; King JL; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 24315611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and validation of the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR Amplification Kit: a MiniSTR multiplex for the analysis of degraded and/or PCR inhibited DNA.
Mulero JJ; Chang CW; Lagacé RE; Wang DY; Bas JL; McMahon TP; Hennessy LK
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):838-52. PubMed ID: 18540972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic DNA typing strategy of degraded DNA on discarded cigarette ends using the AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler®, Identifiler® Plus and MiniFiler™ PCR amplification kits.
Ip SC; Lin SW; Li C; Lai KM
Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 25002050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.
Radojicic V; Keckarevic Markovic M; Puac F; Kecmanovic M; Keckarevic D
Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 29536195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A selection guide for the new generation 6-dye DNA profiling systems.
Lin SW; Li C; Ip SCY
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():34-42. PubMed ID: 28609758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concordance study between the AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit and conventional STR typing kits.
Hill CR; Kline MC; Mulero JJ; Lagacé RE; Chang CW; Hennessy LK; Butler JM
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):870-3. PubMed ID: 17553078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developmental validation of QIAGEN Investigator
Kraemer M; Prochnow A; Bussmann M; Scherer M; Peist R; Steffen C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():9-20. PubMed ID: 28343098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples.
Moretti TR; Baumstark AL; Defenbaugh DA; Keys KM; Smerick JB; Budowle B
J Forensic Sci; 2001 May; 46(3):647-60. PubMed ID: 11373004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Casework testing of the multiplex kits AmpFlSTR SEfiler Plus PCR amplification kit (AB), PowerPlex S5 System (Promega) and AmpFlSTR MiniFiler PCR amplification kit (AB).
Müller K; Sommerer T; Miltner E; Schneider H; Wiegand P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Apr; 4(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 20215032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
