These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914555)
61. Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? Osborne NK; Woods S; Kieser J; Zajac R Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 25002044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A broken system? Examining the perilous state of quality assurance in crime scene practice. Chowdhury M Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):564-572. PubMed ID: 34482936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The relationship between deprivation and forensic material recovered from stolen vehicles: is it affected by vehicle condition and tidiness? Shuttlewood AC; Bond JW; Smith LL J Forensic Sci; 2011 Mar; 56(2):510-3. PubMed ID: 21342195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Advances in Technologies in Crime Scene Investigation. Esposito M; Sessa F; Cocimano G; Zuccarello P; Roccuzzo S; Salerno M Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37891990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The relationship between the detection of acquisitive crime by forensic science and drug-dependent offenders. Bond JW; Sheridan L J Forensic Sci; 2007 Sep; 52(5):1122-8. PubMed ID: 17645745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage. Baechler S Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. The effects of substance use on offender crime scene behavior. Hammond CJ; Bond JW; Grant TD J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):376-81. PubMed ID: 19187448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Cognitive bias in line-up identifications: the impact of administrator knowledge. Canter D; Hammond L; Youngs D Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 23601714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Proactive crime scene response optimizes crime investigation. Wickenheiser RA Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 6():100325. PubMed ID: 37020724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Objective data on DNA success rates can aid the selection process of crime samples for analysis by rapid mobile DNA technologies. Mapes AA; Kloosterman AD; Poot CJ; van Marion V Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jul; 264():28-33. PubMed ID: 27015156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Introducing a Rapid DNA Analysis Procedure for Crime Scene Samples Outside of the Laboratory-A Field Experiment. de Roo R; Mapes A; van Cooten M; van Hooff B; Kneppers S; Kokshoorn B; Valkenburg T; de Poot C Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Context effects and observer bias--implications for forensic odontology. Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jan; 57(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21854387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Expertise in crime scene examination: comparing search strategies of expert and novice crime scene examiners in simulated crime scenes. Baber C; Butler M Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):413-24. PubMed ID: 22768643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Particle size analysis of soils under simulated scene of crime conditions: the interest of multivariate analyses. Chazottes V; Brocard C; Peyrot B Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Mar; 140(2-3):159-66. PubMed ID: 15036437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Emergence of forensic podiatry--A novel sub-discipline of forensic sciences. Krishan K; Kanchan T; DiMaggio JA Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Oct; 255():16-27. PubMed ID: 26163192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Crime scene investigation and dynamic reconstruction: importance of synergic collaboration between forensic pathology and digital reconstruction for work-related fatalities. Feola A; Mizio GD; Sala F; Giordano C; Pietra BD Cesk Patol; 2021; 57(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 33910351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Health professionals and the crime scene: analysis of operational strategies and development of a Data Collection tool]. Costa F; Giontella M; Gioia S Prof Inferm; 2021; 74(3):146-152. PubMed ID: 35084157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime. Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Cognitive challenges at the crime scene: The importance of social science research when introducing mobile technologies at the crime scene. de Gruijter M; de Poot CJ Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():e16-e18. PubMed ID: 30824165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Crime Scene Examination of a Suicidal Pact: A Case Report. Devraj N; Barman S; Sonar VD Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31981. PubMed ID: 36589193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]