These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27914781)

  • 1. Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Vock P
    Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 27914781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
    Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concomitant Imaging Dose and Cancer Risk in Image Guided Thoracic Radiation Therapy.
    Zhang Y; Wu H; Chen Z; Knisely JP; Nath R; Feng Z; Bao S; Deng J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(3):523-31. PubMed ID: 26460994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
    Sabol JM
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
    Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
    Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
    Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation.
    Lungren MP; Yoshizumi TT; Brady SM; Toncheva G; Anderson-Evans C; Lowry C; Zhou XR; Frush D; Hurwitz LM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):W65-73. PubMed ID: 22733933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PATIENT RADIATION DOSE FROM CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN THE WEST BANK-PALESTINE.
    Lahham A; Issa A; ALMasri H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
    Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient doses and projection angle in cone beam CT.
    He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2359-68. PubMed ID: 20527570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of various approaches for assessing dose indicators and patient organ doses resulting from radiotherapy cone-beam CT.
    Rampado O; Giglioli FR; Rossetti V; Fiandra C; Ragona R; Ropolo R
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2515. PubMed ID: 27147362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
    Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conversion factors for determining organ doses received by paediatric patients in high-resolution single slice computed tomography with narrow collimation.
    Seidenbusch MC; Harder D; Regulla DF; Schneider K
    Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 24630933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of dose conversion factors for posterior-anterior chest radiography of adults with a relatively high-energy X-ray spectrum.
    Schultz FW; Geleijns J; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Aug; 67(800):775-85. PubMed ID: 8087483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
    Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose coefficients for organ dosimetry in tomosynthesis imaging of adults and pediatrics across diverse protocols.
    Sharma S; Kapadia A; Ria F; Segars WP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5439-5450. PubMed ID: 35690885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT breast dose reduction with the use of breast positioning and organ-based tube current modulation.
    Fu W; Tian X; Sturgeon GM; Agasthya G; Segars WP; Goodsitt MM; Kazerooni EA; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 28032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
    van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.