These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917139)

  • 1. The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.
    Krajcsi A; Lengyel G; Kojouharova P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1795. PubMed ID: 27917139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.
    Krajcsi A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):927-934. PubMed ID: 27753045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects.
    Krajcsi A; Lengyel G; Kojouharova P
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():124. PubMed ID: 29491845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the ANS Mapping Account and the Proposal of an Alternative Account Based on Symbol-Symbol Associations.
    Reynvoet B; Sasanguie D
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1581. PubMed ID: 27790179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Indo-Arabic distance effect originates in the response statistics of the task.
    Kojouharova P; Krajcsi A
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):468-480. PubMed ID: 30030613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two components of the Indo-Arabic numerical size effect.
    Kojouharova P; Krajcsi A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():163-171. PubMed ID: 30529927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions.
    Leibovich T; Ansari D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 70(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 26913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of math anxiety on symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing.
    Dietrich JF; Huber S; Moeller K; Klein E
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1621. PubMed ID: 26579012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a unified account of nonsymbolic and symbolic representations of number: Insights from a combined psychophysical-computational approach.
    Rinaldi L; Parente L; Marelli M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):985-994. PubMed ID: 34918278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symbolic Numerical Distance Effect Does Not Reflect the Difference between Numbers.
    Krajcsi A; Kojouharova P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2013. PubMed ID: 29250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the Difference Between Numerosity Processing and Number Processing.
    van Hoogmoed AH; Kroesbergen EH
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1650. PubMed ID: 30258376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the neural coding of symbolic quantities.
    Lyons IM; Beilock SL
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():503-518. PubMed ID: 29857048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical estimation in blind subjects: evidence of the impact of blindness and its following experience.
    Castronovo J; Seron X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1089-106. PubMed ID: 17924809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative judgments of symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli yield different patterns of reaction times.
    Leibovich T; Ashkenazi S; Rubinsten O; Henik A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 23933000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Acuity and Manipulability of the ANS Have Separable Influences on Preschoolers' Symbolic Math Achievement.
    Starr A; Tomlinson RC; Brannon EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2554. PubMed ID: 30618975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus frequency alone can account for the size effect in number comparison.
    Krajcsi A; Kojouharova P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Feb; 232():103817. PubMed ID: 36571893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symbolic number comparison and number priming do not rely on the same mechanism.
    Krajcsi A; Szűcs T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1969-1977. PubMed ID: 35503169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners.
    Sasanguie D; Defever E; Maertens B; Reynvoet B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 23767979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task Constraints Affect Mapping From Approximate Number System Estimates to Symbolic Numbers.
    Chesney DL; Matthews PG
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1801. PubMed ID: 30386272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing.
    Libertus ME; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Jan; 3():1. PubMed ID: 17214890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.