These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2791739)

  • 1. [Distribution of radiology fees in cases of referral. Verdict of the Appeals Court of Frankfurt on 25 March 1988].
    Koch B
    Chirurg; 1989 Aug; 60(8):suppl 125-6. PubMed ID: 2791739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reassignment reform: a possible regulatory tool to stunt the growth of in-office imaging.
    Greeson TW; Zimmerman HM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):406-10. PubMed ID: 17544142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stuttgart district court. Radiologist may confine himself to examination order].
    Radiologe; 2002 Oct; 42(10):M180-1. PubMed ID: 12402120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [No fee deduction, because..... The most interesting section 6a GOA cases from ongoing legal decisions].
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):M129. PubMed ID: 9411472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Radiology and the law. Reimbursement also for missed appointment].
    Kleinke S
    Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):293. PubMed ID: 12632583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Are you well informed about roentgen referral and the medical product regulation?].
    Ewen K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(7):228-37. PubMed ID: 10605325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Telephone fees: are they worth it?
    Isaacman DJ
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 8219318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Honorarium sharing between the radiologists and transit physicians. Decision of the Higher Regional Court, Hamm, January 16, 1995].
    Rieger HJ
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1995 Nov; 120(44):1524-6. PubMed ID: 7588023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [General practitioners should not accept reduced fees for psychological codes].
    Zimmermann GW
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2016 Mar; 158(6):36. PubMed ID: 27180386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflicting regulations: Public Act 91-168.
    Thompson MS
    Conn Med; 1992 May; 56(5):274. PubMed ID: 1611904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public service and ethical norms: the courts are speaking; is the medical profession listening?
    Trombetta WL
    Conn Med; 1986 Mar; 50(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 3698590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-referral law's fee caps jolt revenues of Fla. groups.
    de Lafuente D
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Feb; 23(8):33. PubMed ID: 10124230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluate your reimbursement distribution guidelines for legal conformity!].
    Dierks C
    Radiologe; 1997 Apr; 37(4):M47-8. PubMed ID: 9265200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [GSG: specialty fees and case reimbursement--their importance for radiology. Statements. 9. Interdisciplinary consultation in radiology, 9-10 September 1994, Hamburg].
    Gerhard P; Baum PG; Philippi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Mar; 5(2):124-5. PubMed ID: 7756364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Getting the legislative agenda back on track.
    Pulec JL
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Apr; 74(4):213. PubMed ID: 7758416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Expert consultation fees are frequently inflated].
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):M130-1. PubMed ID: 9411473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phone fees: a justification of physician charges.
    Braithwaite SS; Unferth NO
    J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 8219306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court strikes down department of Medicaid's refusal to pay for consultation services.
    Thomas JP
    J Ky Med Assoc; 2002 Oct; 100(10):433-4. PubMed ID: 12395744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Section 6a GOA: private health insurance negates a complicated legal status].
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):M127-8. PubMed ID: 9411471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finally, HCFA proposes regulations interpreting stark II.
    Katayama AC
    WMJ; 1998 Mar; 97(3):67-73. PubMed ID: 9540454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.