These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917517)

  • 1. Student evaluation team focus groups increase students' satisfaction with the overall course evaluation process.
    Brandl K; Mandel J; Winegarden B
    Med Educ; 2017 Feb; 51(2):215-227. PubMed ID: 27917517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fostering Student-Faculty Partnerships for Continuous Curricular Improvement in Undergraduate Medical Education.
    Scott KW; Callahan DG; Chen JJ; Lynn MH; Cote DJ; Morenz A; Fisher J; Antoine VL; Lemoine ER; Bakshi SK; Stuart J; Hundert EM; Chang BS; Gooding H
    Acad Med; 2019 Jul; 94(7):996-1001. PubMed ID: 30920449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Core Clerkships: Lessons Learned From Implementing a Student-Driven Feedback System for Clinical Curricula.
    Russel SM; Geraghty JR; Kobayashi KR; Patel S; Stringham R; Hyderi A; Curry RH
    Acad Med; 2021 Feb; 96(2):232-235. PubMed ID: 33003032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
    Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing medical students' perception of the evaluation culture: Is it possible?
    Colbert-Getz JM; Baumann S
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():8. PubMed ID: 26924629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A disaster medicine curriculum for medical students.
    Kaji AH; Coates W; Fung CC
    Teach Learn Med; 2010 Apr; 22(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20614377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of Integrated Learning Program in neurosciences during first year of traditional medical course: perception of students and faculty.
    Ghosh S; Pandya HV
    BMC Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 8():44. PubMed ID: 18811978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An anticipatory quality improvement process for curricular reform.
    Hollander H; Loeser H; Irby D
    Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):930. PubMed ID: 12228101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does blueprint publication affect students' perception of validity of the evaluation process?
    McLaughlin K; Coderre S; Woloschuk W; Mandin H
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15912281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a problem-based curriculum in midwifery.
    McCourt C; Gail Thomas B
    Midwifery; 2001 Dec; 17(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11749065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of a highly focused case on the effect of small-group facilitators' content expertise on students' learning and satisfaction.
    Davis WK; Oh MS; Anderson RM; Gruppen L; Nairn R
    Acad Med; 1994 Aug; 69(8):663-9. PubMed ID: 8054116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders.
    Muller JH; Jain S; Loeser H; Irby DM
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):778-85. PubMed ID: 18627445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefit of focus group discussion beyond online survey in course evaluations by medical students in the United States: A qualitative study.
    Brandl K; Rabadia SV; Chang A; Mandel J
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():25. PubMed ID: 30321914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Student engagement in medical education: A mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development.
    Milles LS; Hitzblech T; Drees S; Wurl W; Arends P; Peters H
    Med Teach; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 31203695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Student Curriculum Review Team: How we catalyze curricular changes through a student-centered approach.
    Hsih KW; Iscoe MS; Lupton JR; Mains TE; Nayar SK; Orlando MS; Parzuchowski AS; Sabbagh MF; Schulz JC; Shenderov K; Simkin DJ; Vakili S; Vick JB; Xu T; Yin O; Goldberg HR
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(11):1008-12. PubMed ID: 25532595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problem effectiveness in a course using problem-based learning.
    Dolmans DH; Gijselaers WH; Schmidt HG; van der Meer SB
    Acad Med; 1993 Mar; 68(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 8447916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of student feedback to drive quality improvement (QI) in a preclinical U.S. medical school course.
    Richman PS; Olvet DM; Ahmad S; Chandran L
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1583968. PubMed ID: 30810513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Course quality management based on monitoring by students at a medical school.
    Yeo S
    Korean J Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 30(2):141-152. PubMed ID: 29860780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improvement in acute care surgery medical student education and clerkships: use of feedback and loop closure.
    Cherry-Bukowiec JR; Machado-Aranda D; To K; Englesbe M; Ryszawa S; Napolitano LM
    J Surg Res; 2015 Nov; 199(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 26148827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical students' evaluation of a teaching session in occupational medicine: the value of a workplace visit.
    Grime P; Williams S; Nicholson S
    Occup Med (Lond); 2006 Mar; 56(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 16371399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.