These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917558)

  • 21. Sexual signal loss, pleiotropy, and maintenance of a male reproductive polymorphism in crickets.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Nichols RE; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 32187385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct and indirect effects of sexual signal loss on female reproduction in the Pacific field cricket (Teleogryllus oceanicus).
    Heinen-Kay JL; Strub DB; Balenger SL; Zuk M
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1382-1390. PubMed ID: 31495021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Acoustic communication and sexual selection in Orthoptera (Insecta)].
    Vedenina VIu
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2005; 66(4):336-45. PubMed ID: 16212283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Obligately silent males sire more offspring than singers in a rapidly evolving cricket population.
    Heinen-Kay JL; Urquhart EM; Zuk M
    Biol Lett; 2019 Jul; 15(7):20190198. PubMed ID: 31362608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Divergence in male cricket song and female preference functions in three allopatric sister species.
    Hennig RM; Blankers T; Gray DA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 May; 202(5):347-60. PubMed ID: 27026021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. No Effect of Body Size on the Frequency of Calling and Courtship Song in the Two-Spotted Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus.
    Miyashita A; Kizaki H; Sekimizu K; Kaito C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146999. PubMed ID: 26785351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conservation of multivariate female preference functions and preference mechanisms in three species of trilling field crickets.
    Blankers T; Hennig RM; Gray DA
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 28(3):630-41. PubMed ID: 25661511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.
    Blankers T; Lübke AK; Hennig RM
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1656-69. PubMed ID: 26134540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual signal loss in field crickets maintained despite strong sexual selection favoring singing males.
    Tanner JC; Swanger E; Zuk M
    Evolution; 2019 Jul; 73(7):1482-1489. PubMed ID: 31243769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rapid sexual signal diversification is facilitated by permissive females.
    Zhang R; Rayner JG; Bailey NW
    Curr Biol; 2024 Jan; 34(2):403-409.e3. PubMed ID: 38141618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A novel method of comparing mating success and survival reveals similar sexual and viability selection for mobility traits in female tree crickets.
    Ercit K; Gwynne DT
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 26991146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Responses of intended and unintended receivers to a novel sexual signal suggest clandestine communication.
    Tinghitella RM; Broder ED; Gallagher JH; Wikle AW; Zonana DM
    Nat Commun; 2021 Feb; 12(1):797. PubMed ID: 33542210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reproductive isolation in the acoustically divergent groups of tettigoniid, Mecopoda elongata.
    Dutta R; Tregenza T; Balakrishnan R
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188843. PubMed ID: 29182676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Recognition of variable courtship song in the field cricket Gryllus assimilis.
    Vedenina VY; Pollack GS
    J Exp Biol; 2012 Jul; 215(Pt 13):2210-9. PubMed ID: 22675181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signaling in a wild population of Teleogryllus commodus.
    Bentsen CL; Hunt J; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Am Nat; 2006 Apr; 167(4):E102-16. PubMed ID: 16670989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population.
    Rodríguez-Muñoz R; Bretman A; Slate J; Walling CA; Tregenza T
    Science; 2010 Jun; 328(5983):1269-72. PubMed ID: 20522773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of male courtship song in species recognition in Drosophila montana.
    Saarikettu M; Liimatainen JO; Hoikkala A
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 15864441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mate Choice Behavior of Female Field Crickets Is Not Affected by Exposure to Heterospecific Calling Songs.
    Kuriwada T; Kawasaki R; Kuwano A; Reddy GVP
    Environ Entomol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):561-565. PubMed ID: 32270174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surviving the serenade: how conflicting selection pressures shape the early stages of sexual signal diversification.
    Gallagher JH; Broder ED; Wikle AW; O'Toole H; Durso C; Tinghitella RM
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):835-848. PubMed ID: 38436989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Migration strategy and divergent sexual selection on bird song.
    Collins SA; de Kort SR; Pérez-Tris J; Tellería JL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1656):585-90. PubMed ID: 18945666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.