These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917560)

  • 1. Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Krucien N; Watson V; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2017 Dec; 26(12):e1-e16. PubMed ID: 27917560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
    Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
    Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the Self-Reported Acceptability of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Study in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
    Li F; Liu S; Gu Y; Li S; Tao Y; Wei Y; Chen Y
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2024; 18():1803-1813. PubMed ID: 39229369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey.
    Webb EJD; Meads D; Lynch Y; Judge S; Randall N; Goldbart J; Meredith S; Moulam L; Hess S; Murray J
    Value Health; 2021 Apr; 24(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 33840436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
    Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
    Ratcliffe J; Couzner L; Flynn T; Sawyer M; Stevens K; Brazier J; Burgess L
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
    Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment.
    Soekhai V; Donkers B; Johansson JV; Jimenez-Moreno C; Pinto CA; de Wit GA; de Bekker-Grob E
    Patient; 2023 May; 16(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 36781628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.
    Mühlbacher AC; Kaczynski A; Zweifel P; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):2. PubMed ID: 26743636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eliciting preferences to the EQ-5D-5L health states: discrete choice experiment or multiprofile case of best-worst scaling?
    Xie F; Pullenayegum E; Gaebel K; Oppe M; Krabbe PF
    Eur J Health Econ; 2014 Apr; 15(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 23553075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Review of Patients' and Parents' Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care.
    Schatz NK; Fabiano GA; Cunningham CE; dosReis S; Waschbusch DA; Jerome S; Lupas K; Morris KL
    Patient; 2015 Dec; 8(6):483-97. PubMed ID: 25644223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Empirical Comparison of Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling to Estimate Stakeholders' Risk Tolerance for Hip Replacement Surgery.
    van Dijk JD; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; Marshall DA; IJzerman MJ
    Value Health; 2016 Jun; 19(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 27325322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: an empirical comparison using social care data.
    Potoglou D; Burge P; Flynn T; Netten A; Malley J; Forder J; Brazier JE
    Soc Sci Med; 2011 May; 72(10):1717-27. PubMed ID: 21530040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
    Ratcliffe J; Flynn T; Terlich F; Stevens K; Brazier J; Sawyer M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental measurement of preferences in health care using best-worst scaling (BWS): theoretical and statistical issues.
    Mühlbacher AC; Zweifel P; Kaczynski A; Johnson FR
    Health Econ Rev; 2016 Dec; 6(1):5. PubMed ID: 26822869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valuing Treatments for Parkinson Disease Incorporating Process Utility: Performance of Best-Worst Scaling, Time Trade-Off, and Visual Analogue Scales.
    Weernink MG; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG; IJzerman MJ; van Til JA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 27021757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. German tariffs for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluations at the end of life.
    Dams J; Huynh E; Riedel-Heller S; Löbner M; Brettschneider C; König HH
    Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Apr; 22(3):365-380. PubMed ID: 33475868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments.
    Severin F; Schmidtke J; Mühlbacher A; Rogowski WH
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Nov; 21(11):1202-8. PubMed ID: 23486538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.