BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

374 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917790)

  • 1. Retrospective air bone gap evaluation of patients with tympanic membrane central perforation.
    Küçükkavruk L; Temügan E; Kaya M; Unsal S; Gumus NM; Yüksel M; Gündüz M
    Clin Invest Med; 2016 Dec; 39(6):27499. PubMed ID: 27917790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Type III tympanoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis: anatomic and functional results.
    Iñiguez-Cuadra R; Alobid I; Borés-Domenech A; Menéndez-Colino LM; Caballero-Borrego M; Bernal-Sprekelsen M
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 20042992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does cartilage tympanoplasty impair hearing in patients with normal preoperative hearing? A comparison of different techniques.
    Balcı MK; İşlek A; Ciğer E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):673-677. PubMed ID: 30600345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-Frequency Conductive Hearing following Total Drum Replacement Tympanoplasty.
    Polanik MD; Trakimas DR; Black NL; Cheng JT; Kozin ED; Remenschneider AK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jun; 162(6):914-921. PubMed ID: 32097057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fascia versus cartilage graft in type I tympanoplasty: audiological outcome.
    Kim JY; Oh JH; Lee HH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e605-8. PubMed ID: 23172493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic tympanoplasty with limited tympanomeatal flap elevation in pediatric cases: comparison of anatomic and audiological results of grafts.
    Şen A; Özdamar K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Sep; 276(9):2427-2432. PubMed ID: 31187239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.
    Demirpehlivan IA; Onal K; Arslanoglu S; Songu M; Ciger E; Can N
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 21267588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique for reconstruction of tympanic membrane perforation: anatomic and audiologic results.
    Ulkü CH
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2010; 20(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20163331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can myringoplasty close the air-bone gap?
    Pfammatter A; Novoa E; Linder T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun; 34(4):705-10. PubMed ID: 23652328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boomerang-shaped vs. shield-shaped chondroperichondrial cartilage grafts for type 1 tympanoplasty in children: A study of 121 patients.
    Özbay C; Soy FK; Kulduk E; Dundar R; Yükkaldiran A; Güler OK; Koç E
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017; 96(10-11):419-432. PubMed ID: 29121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral tympanoplasty for total or near-total perforation: prognostic factors.
    Angeli SI; Kulak JL; Guzmán J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Sep; 116(9):1594-9. PubMed ID: 16954986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients using tragal cartilage.
    Awad OG; Hamid KA
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jun; 141(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 25928190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.
    Tek A; Karaman M; Uslu C; Habeşoğlu T; Kılıçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Esen S; Egeli E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21968630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic roles of preoperative CT findings and air-bone gaps in type 1 tympanoplasty.
    Onofre R; Ha SC; Yang CJ; Lee HS; Lee JY; Yoo MH; Park JW; Kang BC; Park HJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):795-800. PubMed ID: 29936881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty in children.
    Dursun E; Demir E; Terzi S; Erdivanlı ÖÇ; Coşkun ZÖ; Balaban GA; Çeliker M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109854. PubMed ID: 31918245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of stapes mobility on hearing outcome and which procedure to choose in fixed stapes in children tympanosclerosis.
    Kizilkaya Z; Emir H; Ceylan K; Gocmen H; Samim E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):849-56. PubMed ID: 18394718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft (WsCCG) and temporalis fascia for type 1 tympanoplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
    Ciğer E; Balcı MK; İşlek A; Önal K
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 275(12):2975-2981. PubMed ID: 30317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revision tympanoplasty using scar tissue graft.
    Djalilian HR
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 16436980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medial or medio-lateral graft tympanoplasty for repair of tympanic membrane perforation.
    Jung T; Kim YH; Kim YH; Park SK; Martin D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):941-3. PubMed ID: 19403180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of hearing levels and tympanic membrane healing obtained by cartilage palisade and temporal fascia tympanoplasty techniques: preliminary results].
    Solmaz MA; Yücel EA; Ozdemir M; Güldiken Y; Değer K
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2002; 9(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12422082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.