156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917808)
41. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.
Ray AA; Ghiculete D; Pace KT; Honey RJ
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 20206970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Gigantic pyohydronephrosis and contralateral ureteral bud. Problems of differential diagnosis].
Krüger E; Lenz M; Walz PH
Urologe A; 1993 Jul; 32(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 8372415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Low-dose and standard computed tomography scans yield equivalent stone measurements.
Sohn W; Clayman RV; Lee JY; Cohen A; Mucksavage P
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 23374764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic.
Moon YJ; Kim HW; Kim JB; Kim HJ; Chang YS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):717-21. PubMed ID: 26495073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bilateral same-session ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral calculi: critical analysis of risk factors.
El-Hefnawy AS; El-Nahas AR; El-Tabey NA; Shoma AM; El-Assmy AM; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Eraky I
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 21082875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [A case of ammonium acid urate urinary stone].
Seike K; Nishida Y; Yamamoto N; Maeda S
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):689-92. PubMed ID: 19048938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. L-shaped cross-fused kidney with stone.
Chung SD; Chueh SC; Chiang HS; Liao CH
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 18692871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Is ureteroscopy first line treatment for pediatric stone disease?
Smaldone MC; Cannon GM; Wu HY; Bassett J; Polsky EG; Bellinger MF; Docimo SG; Schneck FX
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2128-31; discussion 2131. PubMed ID: 17870124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Unenhanced urinary CT: value of parenchymal attenuation measurements in differentiating acute vs. chronic renal obstruction.
Erbaş G; Oktar S; Kiliç K; Sen I; Budakoğlu II; Araç M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):825-9. PubMed ID: 21388763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic.
Eisner BH; Reese A; Sheth S; Stoller ML
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):165-8. PubMed ID: 19450856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup.
Portis AJ; Rygwall R; Holtz C; Pshon N; Laliberte M
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2129-33; discussion 2133-4. PubMed ID: 16697818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Decreased renal parenchymal density on unenhanced helical computed tomography for diagnosis of ureteral stone disease in emergent patients with acute flank pain.
Huang CC; Wong YC; Wang LJ; Chiu TF; Ng CJ; Chen JC
Chang Gung Med J; 2008; 31(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 18567419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Routine postoperative imaging is important after ureteroscopic stone manipulation.
Weizer AZ; Auge BK; Silverstein AD; Delvecchio FC; Brizuela RM; Dahm P; Pietrow PK; Lewis BR; Albala DM; Preminger GM
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 12050490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Trends in the use of unenhanced helical CT for acute urinary colic.
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ; Saunders HS; Dyer RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1447-50. PubMed ID: 10584780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Unenhanced computerized axial tomography to detect retained calculi after percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy.
Waldmann TB; Lashley DB; Fuchs EF
J Urol; 1999 Aug; 162(2):312-4. PubMed ID: 10411027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Stone characteristics on noncontrast computed tomography: establishing definitive patterns to discriminate calcium and uric acid compositions.
Marchini GS; Remer EM; Gebreselassie S; Liu X; Pynadath C; Snyder G; Monga M
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 23987148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact of renal anatomy on shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for lower pole kidney stones: results of a prospective multifactorial analysis controlled by computerized tomography.
Torricelli FC; Marchini GS; Yamauchi FI; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Srougi M; Monga M; Mazzucchi E
J Urol; 2015 Jun; 193(6):2002-7. PubMed ID: 25524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Is measurement of stone surface area necessary for SWL treatment of nonstaghorn calculi?
Buchholz NP; Rhabar MH; Talati J
J Endourol; 2002 May; 16(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 12042102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. How accurate is unenhanced multidetector-row CT (MDCT) for localization of renal calculi?
Goetschi S; Umbehr M; Ullrich S; Glenck M; Suter S; Weishaupt D
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3084-9. PubMed ID: 22695785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
