These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27917919)
1. NIPTRIC: an online tool for clinical interpretation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results. Sikkema-Raddatz B; Johansson LF; de Boer EN; Boon EM; Suijkerbuijk RF; Bouman K; Bilardo CM; Swertz MA; Dijkstra M; van Langen IM; Sinke RJ; Te Meerman GJ Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38359. PubMed ID: 27917919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory. Petersen AK; Cheung SW; Smith JL; Bi W; Ward PA; Peacock S; Braxton A; Van Den Veyver IB; Breman AM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 217(6):691.e1-691.e6. PubMed ID: 29032050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Combining Effects of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA of Breast Tumor to the Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Results: A Simulating Investigation. Cai YH; Yao GY; Chen LJ; Gan HY; Ye CS; Yang XX DNA Cell Biol; 2018 Jul; 37(7):626-633. PubMed ID: 29957029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of cell-free DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in a National Health Service Regional Genetics Laboratory. Togneri FS; Kilby MD; Young E; Court S; Williams D; Griffiths MJ; Allen SK Genet Res (Camb); 2019 Dec; 101():e11. PubMed ID: 31813398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rare Down syndrome foetus with de novo 21q;21q rearrangements causing false negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing: a case report. Xu HH; Dai MZ; Wang K; Zhang Y; Pan FY; Shi WW BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Jul; 13(1):96. PubMed ID: 32631433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical evaluation of true and false positive Z values among high-risk cases screened by non-invasive prenatal testing]. Mo J; Ren J; Yang L; Shen X; Zhao D; Xiao Y Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Nov; 39(11):1187-1191. PubMed ID: 36317201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies. Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ; J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between Z score, fetal fraction, and sequencing reads in non-invasive prenatal testing. Balslev-Harder M; Richter SR; Kjaergaard S; Johansen P Prenat Diagn; 2017 Sep; 37(9):943-945. PubMed ID: 28726258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening. Qi Y; Yang J; Hou Y; Guo F; Peng H; Wang D; Du Q; Yin A Hum Genomics; 2019 Apr; 13(1):18. PubMed ID: 30971315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Women's preference for non-invasive prenatal DNA testing versus chromosomal microarray after screening for Down syndrome: a prospective study. Cheng Y; Leung WC; Leung TY; Choy KW; Chiu R; Lo TK; Kwok KY; Sahota DS BJOG; 2018 Mar; 125(4):451-459. PubMed ID: 29125674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of grey zone in common foetal aneuploidy screening by semiconductor sequencing. Zhang C; He Q; Qiao L; Li H; Wang T J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 35465819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discordant performances of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal trisomy 21 screening in subgroups of pregnancies. Suo F; Wang Y; Wang N; Wang Y; Liao M; Wang J; Wang C; Zhang Y; Zhang M; Zhang C; Gu M; Gou L J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(2):2288226. PubMed ID: 38054928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Freezing on Non-invasive Prenatal Testing. Xie X; Li F; Tan W; Yin W; Chen F; Guo X Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):6962. PubMed ID: 31061472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of detection of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities]. Wang SJ; Gao ZY; Lu YP; Li YL; You YQ; Zhang LW; Wang LX; Xu H Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 47(11):808-12. PubMed ID: 23302119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Beulen L; Grutters JP; Faas BH; Feenstra I; van Vugt JM; Bekker MN Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():53-61. PubMed ID: 25238658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access. Birko S; Ravitsky V; Dupras C; Le Clerc-Blain J; Lemoine ME; Affdal AO; Haidar H; Laberge AM BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 30630440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy 21: what women want and are willing to pay. Verweij EJ; Oepkes D; de Vries M; van den Akker ME; van den Akker ES; de Boer MA Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Dec; 93(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 24011429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive prenatal testing: A diagnostic innovation shaped by commercial interests and the regulation conundrum. Löwy I Soc Sci Med; 2022 Jul; 304():113064. PubMed ID: 32534823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies. Audibert F; Gagnon A; ; J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):754-67. PubMed ID: 21749753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]