266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27918485)
1. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Followed by CRIPSR/Cas9 Microinjection Results in Highly Efficient Genome Editing in Cloned Pigs.
Sheets TP; Park CH; Park KE; Powell A; Donovan DM; Telugu BP
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 27918485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated biallelic gene disruption and site-specific knockin after rapid selection of highly active sgRNAs in pigs.
Wang X; Zhou J; Cao C; Huang J; Hai T; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Zhang H; Qin G; Miao X; Wang H; Cao S; Zhou Q; Zhao J
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13348. PubMed ID: 26293209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simplified CRISPR tools for efficient genome editing and streamlined protocols for their delivery into mammalian cells and mouse zygotes.
Jacobi AM; Rettig GR; Turk R; Collingwood MA; Zeiner SA; Quadros RM; Harms DW; Bonthuis PJ; Gregg C; Ohtsuka M; Gurumurthy CB; Behlke MA
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():16-28. PubMed ID: 28351759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient production of biallelic GGTA1 knockout pigs by cytoplasmic microinjection of CRISPR/Cas9 into zygotes.
Petersen B; Frenzel A; Lucas-Hahn A; Herrmann D; Hassel P; Klein S; Ziegler M; Hadeler KG; Niemann H
Xenotransplantation; 2016 Sep; 23(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 27610605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
Wefers B; Bashir S; Rossius J; Wurst W; Kühn R
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():55-67. PubMed ID: 28263886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome Editing in Pigs.
Preisinger D; Winogrodzki T; Klinger B; Schnieke A; Rieblinger B
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2631():393-417. PubMed ID: 36995680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysing the outcome of CRISPR-aided genome editing in embryos: Screening, genotyping and quality control.
Mianné J; Codner GF; Caulder A; Fell R; Hutchison M; King R; Stewart ME; Wells S; Teboul L
Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():68-76. PubMed ID: 28363792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Production of
Dua S; Bansal S; Gautam D; Jose B; Singh P; Singh MK; De S; Kumar D; Yadav PS; Kues W; Selokar NL
Cell Reprogram; 2023 Jun; 25(3):121-127. PubMed ID: 37042654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of genome-editing systems to enhance available pig resources for agriculture and biomedicine.
Lee K; Farrell K; Uh K
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2019 Jan; 32(2):40-49. PubMed ID: 32188556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electroporation of mice zygotes with dual guide RNA/Cas9 complexes for simple and efficient cloning-free genome editing.
Teixeira M; Py BF; Bosc C; Laubreton D; Moutin MJ; Marvel J; Flamant F; Markossian S
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):474. PubMed ID: 29323173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficient generation of genetically distinct pigs in a single pregnancy using multiplexed single-guide RNA and carbohydrate selection.
Li P; Estrada JL; Burlak C; Montgomery J; Butler JR; Santos RM; Wang ZY; Paris LL; Blankenship RL; Downey SM; Tector M; Tector AJ
Xenotransplantation; 2015; 22(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 25178170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generation of CRISPR-Edited Rodents Using a Piezo-Driven Zygote Injection Technique.
Scott MA; Hu YC
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1874():169-178. PubMed ID: 30353513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome Editing in Mice Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.
Hall B; Cho A; Limaye A; Cho K; Khillan J; Kulkarni AB
Curr Protoc Cell Biol; 2018 Dec; 81(1):e57. PubMed ID: 30178917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to produce genetically engineered pigs from in vitro-derived oocytes and embryos.
Whitworth KM; Lee K; Benne JA; Beaton BP; Spate LD; Murphy SL; Samuel MS; Mao J; O'Gorman C; Walters EM; Murphy CN; Driver J; Mileham A; McLaren D; Wells KD; Prather RS
Biol Reprod; 2014 Sep; 91(3):78. PubMed ID: 25100712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Generation of genome-edited dogs by somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Kim DE; Lee JH; Ji KB; Park KS; Kil TY; Koo O; Kim MK
BMC Biotechnol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):19. PubMed ID: 35831828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient generation of GGTA1-deficient pigs by electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into in vitro-fertilized zygotes.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Sawamoto O; Kikuchi T; Doi M; Otoi T
BMC Biotechnol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 32811500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation.
Tanihara F; Hirata M; Nguyen NT; Le QA; Hirano T; Takemoto T; Nakai M; Fuchimoto DI; Otoi T
Anim Sci J; 2019 Jan; 90(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30368976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Engineering CRISPR/Cpf1 with tRNA promotes genome editing capability in mammalian systems.
Wu H; Liu Q; Shi H; Xie J; Zhang Q; Ouyang Z; Li N; Yang Y; Liu Z; Zhao Y; Lai C; Ruan D; Peng J; Ge W; Chen F; Fan N; Jin Q; Liang Y; Lan T; Yang X; Wang X; Lei Z; Doevendans PA; Sluijter JPG; Wang K; Li X; Lai L
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2018 Oct; 75(19):3593-3607. PubMed ID: 29637228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Generation of Genome-Edited Mice by Cytoplasmic Injection of CRISPR-Cas9 RNA.
Horii T; Hatada I
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2637():75-86. PubMed ID: 36773139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Highly Efficient Mouse Genome Editing by CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Electroporation of Zygotes.
Chen S; Lee B; Lee AY; Modzelewski AJ; He L
J Biol Chem; 2016 Jul; 291(28):14457-67. PubMed ID: 27151215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
