These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

826 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27918707)

  • 1. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Diagnostic Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Sprague BL; Arao RF; Miglioretti DL; Henderson LM; Buist DS; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lee JM; Tosteson AN; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD;
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 28244803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National Performance Benchmarks for Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lee CI; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Onega T; Kerlikowske K; Lee JM; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher GH; Bowles EJA; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Henderson LM;
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222499. PubMed ID: 37039687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.
    Rosenberg RD; Yankaskas BC; Abraham LA; Sickles EA; Lehman CD; Geller BM; Carney PA; Kerlikowske K; Buist DS; Weaver DL; Barlow WE; Ballard-Barbash R
    Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 16990671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
    Sickles EA; Miglioretti DL; Ballard-Barbash R; Geller BM; Leung JW; Rosenberg RD; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas BC
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):775-90. PubMed ID: 15914475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening Digital Mammography Recall Rate: Does It Change with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Experience?
    DiPrete O; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Mainiero MB
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):838-844. PubMed ID: 29173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologist Characteristics Associated with Interpretive Performance of Screening Mammography: A National Mammography Database (NMD) Study.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Hughes D; Golden D; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Hemingway J; Geras A; Duszak R; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2021 Sep; 300(3):518-528. PubMed ID: 34156300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Smith RA; Carney PA; Miglioretti DL; Monsees BS; Sickles EA; Taplin SH; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Onega TL
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 24960110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Simulation Screening Mammography Module Created for Instruction and Assessment: Radiology Residents vs National Benchmarks.
    Poot JD; Chetlen AL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1454-1462. PubMed ID: 27637285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance Benchmarks for Screening Breast MR Imaging in Community Practice.
    Lee JM; Ichikawa L; Valencia E; Miglioretti DL; Wernli K; Buist DSM; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Sprague BL; Onega T; Rauscher GH; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 28582633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.
    Lee CS; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Burnside ES; Nagy P; Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):883-90. PubMed ID: 26866649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
    Lee CS; Moy L; Friedewald SM; Sickles EA; Monticciolo DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):241-245. PubMed ID: 29045178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population.
    Aujero MP; Gavenonis SC; Benjamin R; Zhang Z; Holt JS
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 28221096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.
    Buist DS; Anderson ML; Haneuse SJ; Sickles EA; Smith RA; Carney PA; Taplin SH; Rosenberg RD; Geller BM; Onega TL; Monsees BS; Bassett LW; Yankaskas BC; Elmore JG; Kerlikowske K; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 21343539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for identifying radiologists with acceptable screening mammography interpretive performance on basis of multiple performance measures.
    Miglioretti DL; Ichikawa L; Smith RA; Bassett LW; Feig SA; Monsees B; Parikh JR; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Carney PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):W486-91. PubMed ID: 25794100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?
    Jackson SL; Cook AJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Brenner RJ; Elmore JG
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 22130089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Kuhl CK; Strobel K; Bieling H; Leutner C; Schild HH; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 28221097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic mammography: identifying minimally acceptable interpretive performance criteria.
    Carney PA; Parikh J; Sickles EA; Feig SA; Monsees B; Bassett LW; Smith RA; Rosenberg R; Ichikawa L; Wallace J; Tran K; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 23297329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Range of Radiologist Performance in a Population-based Screening Cohort of 1 Million Digital Mammography Examinations.
    Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 32720866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.