217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27919292)
1. Cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer amongst postmenopausal women: a model-based economic evaluation.
Kearns B; Chilcott J; Whyte S; Preston L; Sadler S
BMC Med; 2016 Dec; 14(1):200. PubMed ID: 27919292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States: Secondary Analysis of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
Moss HA; Berchuck A; Neely ML; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Feb; 4(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 29222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer: results from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
Menon U; McGuire AJ; Raikou M; Ryan A; Davies SK; Burnell M; Gentry-Maharaj A; Kalsi JK; Singh N; Amso NN; Cruickshank D; Dobbs S; Godfrey K; Herod J; Leeson S; Mould T; Murdoch J; Oram D; Scott I; Seif MW; Williamson K; Woolas R; Fallowfield L; Campbell S; Skates SJ; Parmar M; Jacobs IJ
Br J Cancer; 2017 Aug; 117(5):619-627. PubMed ID: 28742794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mortality impact, risks, and benefits of general population screening for ovarian cancer: the UKCTOCS randomised controlled trial.
Menon U; Gentry-Maharaj A; Burnell M; Ryan A; Kalsi JK; Singh N; Dawnay A; Fallowfield L; McGuire AJ; Campbell S; Skates SJ; Parmar M; Jacobs IJ
Health Technol Assess; 2023 May; ():1-81. PubMed ID: 37183782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.
Jacobs IJ; Menon U; Ryan A; Gentry-Maharaj A; Burnell M; Kalsi JK; Amso NN; Apostolidou S; Benjamin E; Cruickshank D; Crump DN; Davies SK; Dawnay A; Dobbs S; Fletcher G; Ford J; Godfrey K; Gunu R; Habib M; Hallett R; Herod J; Jenkins H; Karpinskyj C; Leeson S; Lewis SJ; Liston WR; Lopes A; Mould T; Murdoch J; Oram D; Rabideau DJ; Reynolds K; Scott I; Seif MW; Sharma A; Singh N; Taylor J; Warburton F; Widschwendter M; Williamson K; Woolas R; Fallowfield L; McGuire AJ; Campbell S; Parmar M; Skates SJ
Lancet; 2016 Mar; 387(10022):945-956. PubMed ID: 26707054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
Menon U; Gentry-Maharaj A; Hallett R; Ryan A; Burnell M; Sharma A; Lewis S; Davies S; Philpott S; Lopes A; Godfrey K; Oram D; Herod J; Williamson K; Seif MW; Scott I; Mould T; Woolas R; Murdoch J; Dobbs S; Amso NN; Leeson S; Cruickshank D; McGuire A; Campbell S; Fallowfield L; Singh N; Dawnay A; Skates SJ; Parmar M; Jacobs I
Lancet Oncol; 2009 Apr; 10(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 19282241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.
Menon U; Gentry-Maharaj A; Burnell M; Singh N; Ryan A; Karpinskyj C; Carlino G; Taylor J; Massingham SK; Raikou M; Kalsi JK; Woolas R; Manchanda R; Arora R; Casey L; Dawnay A; Dobbs S; Leeson S; Mould T; Seif MW; Sharma A; Williamson K; Liu Y; Fallowfield L; McGuire AJ; Campbell S; Skates SJ; Jacobs IJ; Parmar M
Lancet; 2021 Jun; 397(10290):2182-2193. PubMed ID: 33991479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Smith HS; Hao J; Hassen D; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Peterson JF; Williams MS; Veenstra DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022874. PubMed ID: 33119106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ovarian cancer screening effectiveness: A realization from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.
Pavlik EJ
Womens Health (Lond); 2016 Sep; 12(5):475-479. PubMed ID: 27595999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Kim JJ; Campos NG; Sy S; Burger EA; Cuzick J; Castle PE; Hunt WC; Waxman A; Wheeler CM;
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Oct; 163(8):589-97. PubMed ID: 26414147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review and economic evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of aldosterone antagonists for postmyocardial infarction heart failure.
McKenna C; Burch J; Suekarran S; Walker S; Bakhai A; Witte K; Harden M; Wright K; Woolacott N; Lorgelly P; Fenwick L; Palmer S
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(24):1-162. PubMed ID: 20492762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC).
Tsiachristas A; Gittins M; Kitchener H; Gray A
J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 28530515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cost-effectiveness of systematic screening for age-related macular degeneration in South Korea.
Ra H; Song LD; Choi JA; Jee D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206690. PubMed ID: 30379971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining the risk threshold for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in low risk postmenopausal women.
Manchanda R; Legood R; Pearce L; Menon U
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Dec; 139(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26436478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In patients with unprovoked VTE, does the addition of FDG PET/CT to a limited occult cancer screening strategy offer good value for money? A cost-effectiveness analysis from the publicly funded health care systems.
Robin P; Kumar S; Salaun PY; Le Roux PY; Couturaud F; Planquette B; Merah A; Roy PM; Thavorn K; Le Gal G
Thromb Res; 2018 Nov; 171():97-102. PubMed ID: 30268859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of ovarian cancer screening on sexual activity and functioning: results from the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening RCT.
Fallowfield L; Solis-Trapala I; Menon U; Langridge C; May S; Jacobs I; Jenkins V
Br J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 116(8):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 28324886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ovarian cancer screening with the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA): Good, bad, or just expensive?
Naumann RW; Brown J
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 149(1):117-120. PubMed ID: 29398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of embryo transfer strategies: a decision analytic model using long-term costs and consequences of singletons and multiples born as a consequence of IVF.
van Heesch MM; van Asselt AD; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Dumoulin JC; van Beijsterveldt CE; Bonsel GJ; Dykgraaf RH; van Goudoever JB; Koopman-Esseboom C; Nelen WL; Steiner K; Tamminga P; Tonch N; Torrance HL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2527-2540. PubMed ID: 27907897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Systematic Review on Cost-effectiveness Studies Evaluating Ovarian Cancer Early Detection and Prevention Strategies.
Sroczynski G; Gogollari A; Kuehne F; Hallsson LR; Widschwendter M; Pashayan N; Siebert U
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 May; 13(5):429-442. PubMed ID: 32071120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.
Pandya A; Doran T; Zhu J; Walker S; Arntson E; Ryan AM
BMC Med; 2018 Aug; 16(1):135. PubMed ID: 30153827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
