BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27919400)

  • 21. [Benefits and usability of a pharmaceutical record in medical practice. A survey of hospital doctors and pharmacists (MATRIX study)].
    Schuers M; Timsit M; Gillibert A; Fred A; Griffon N; Bénichou J; Darmoni SJ; Staccini P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2016 Sep; 64(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 27592034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Usability Evaluation of a Dashboard for Home Care Nurses.
    Dowding D; Merrill JA; Barrón Y; Onorato N; Jonas K; Russell D
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2019 Jan; 37(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30394879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing Norwegian nurses' and physicians' perceptions of the needs of significant others in intensive care units.
    Takman C; Severinsson E
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 May; 14(5):621-31. PubMed ID: 15840077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attitudes of Danish doctors and nurses to palliative and terminal care.
    Vejlgaard T; Addington-Hall JM
    Palliat Med; 2005 Mar; 19(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15810750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Usage Behavior and Intention Stability of Nurses: An Empirical Study of a Nursing Information System.
    Lin IC; Lin C; Hsu CL; Roan J; Yeh JS; Cheng YH
    J Nurs Res; 2016 Mar; 24(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 26551211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Checking the potential shift to perceived usefulness-The analysis of users' response to the updated electronic health record core features.
    Rajković P; Aleksić D; Janković D; Milenković A; Petković I
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jul; 115():80-91. PubMed ID: 29779723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Usability Testing a Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dashboard: A Core Component of the Dashboard Development Process.
    Richter Lagha R; Burningham Z; Sauer BC; Leng J; Peters C; Huynh T; Patel S; Halwani AS; Kramer BJ
    Appl Clin Inform; 2020 Aug; 11(4):528-534. PubMed ID: 32785904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Health professionals' perceptions about their clinical performance and the influence of audit and feedback on their intentions to improve practice: a theory-based study in Dutch intensive care units.
    Gude WT; Roos-Blom MJ; van der Veer SN; Dongelmans DA; de Jonge E; Francis JJ; Peek N; de Keizer NF
    Implement Sci; 2018 Feb; 13(1):33. PubMed ID: 29454393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relative influence of team climate, team norms and social network norms on health professionals' implementation of a national recommendation to offer service-users diagnosed with schizophrenia family intervention therapy.
    Hanbury A
    Psychol Health Med; 2013; 18(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 23362974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors associated with experiences and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards family-witnessed resuscitation: a cross-sectional study.
    Sak-Dankosky N; Andruszkiewicz P; Sherwood PR; Kvist T
    J Adv Nurs; 2015 Nov; 71(11):2595-608. PubMed ID: 26222225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Involving end-users in the design of an audit and feedback intervention in the emergency department setting - a mixed methods study.
    van Deen WK; Cho ES; Pustolski K; Wixon D; Lamb S; Valente TW; Menchine M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):270. PubMed ID: 31035992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implementation of an emergency department computer system: design features that users value.
    Batley NJ; Osman HO; Kazzi AA; Musallam KM
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 41(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 20619572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Healthcare Professionals' Expectations of a Diabetes Care Performance Management System.
    Hörhammer I; Jäppinen J; Linna M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():1680-1681. PubMed ID: 31438290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.
    Arai H; Ouchi Y; Toba K; Endo T; Shimokado K; Tsubota K; Matsuo S; Mori H; Yumura W; Yokode M; Rakugi H; Ohshima S
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2015 Jun; 15(6):673-87. PubMed ID: 25656311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nurses' perceptions and attitudes towards computerisation in a private hospital.
    Chow SK; Chin WY; Lee HY; Leung HC; Tang FH
    J Clin Nurs; 2012 Jun; 21(11-12):1685-96. PubMed ID: 22081971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study.
    Durieux P; Bissery A; Dubois S; Gasquet I; Coste J
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 15175490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurses' attitudes toward the use of the bar-coding medication administration system.
    Marini SD; Hasman A; Huijer HA; Dimassi H
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2010; 28(2):112-23. PubMed ID: 20182162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.