440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27920117)
1. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure in primary care.
van Dijk I; Scholten Meilink Lenferink N; Lucassen PL; Mercer SW; van Weel C; Olde Hartman TC; Speckens AE
Fam Pract; 2017 Feb; 34(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 27920117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE measure in a general medicine outpatient setting.
Aomatsu M; Abe H; Abe K; Yasui H; Suzuki T; Sato J; Ban N; Mercer SW
Fam Pract; 2014 Feb; 31(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 24115011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong.
Fung CS; Hua A; Tam L; Mercer SW
Fam Pract; 2009 Oct; 26(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 19587027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of the Spanish (Spain) version of the consultation and relational empathy measure in primary care.
García Del Barrio L; Rodríguez-Díez C; Martín-Lanas R; Costa P; Costa MJ; Díez N
Fam Pract; 2021 Jun; 38(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 33340321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring empathic, person-centred communication in primary care nurses: validity and reliability of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure.
Bikker AP; Fitzpatrick B; Murphy D; Mercer SW
BMC Fam Pract; 2015 Oct; 16():149. PubMed ID: 26493072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Swedish version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.
Crosta Ahlforn K; Bojner Horwitz E; Osika W
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2017 Sep; 35(3):286-292. PubMed ID: 28768444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the Croatian version of Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in primary care setting.
Hanževački M; Jakovina T; Bajić Ž; Tomac A; Mercer S
Croat Med J; 2015 Feb; 56(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25727042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 2-item version of the Japanese Consultation and Relational Empathy measure: a pilot study using secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey in primary care.
Takahashi N; Matsuhisa T; Takahashi K; Aomatsu M; Mercer SW; Ban N
Fam Pract; 2022 Nov; 39(6):1169-1175. PubMed ID: 35471659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure.
Mercer SW; Maxwell M; Heaney D; Watt GC
Fam Pract; 2004 Dec; 21(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 15528286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure.
Arigliani M; Castriotta L; Pusiol A; Titolo A; Petoello E; Brun Peressut A; Miorin E; Elkina I; Marzona F; Cucchiaro D; Spanghero E; Pavan M; Arigliani R; Mercer SW; Cogo P
BMC Pediatr; 2018 Feb; 18(1):57. PubMed ID: 29439733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.
Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Pieterse AH; Kroonenberg PM; Scholl I; van der Weijden T; Luyten GP; Kruitwagen RF; den Ouden H; Carlier IV; van Vliet IM; Zitman FG; Stiggelbout AM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132158. PubMed ID: 26151946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How many patients are required to provide a high level of reliability in the Japanese version of the CARE Measure? A secondary analysis.
Matsuhisa T; Takahashi N; Aomatsu M; Takahashi K; Nishino J; Ban N; Mercer SW
BMC Fam Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 30115032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.
Al-Habbal K; Djoundourian A; Nassar E; Tayara Z; Mercer SW; Abi-Habib R
Fam Pract; 2022 Nov; 39(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 35616114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.
Park KY; Shin J; Park HK; Kim YM; Hwang SY; Shin JH; Heo R; Ryu S; Mercer SW
BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):403. PubMed ID: 35614452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing medical student empathy in a family medicine clinical test: validity of the CARE measure.
Chen JY; Chin WY; Fung CS; Wong CK; Tsang JP
Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():27346. PubMed ID: 26154863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of the Italian version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure: translation, internal reliability, and construct validity in patients undergoing rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Natali F; Corradini L; Sconza C; Taylor P; Furlan R; Mercer SW; Gatti R
Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Feb; 45(4):703-708. PubMed ID: 35191359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Validity and Reliability of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale-Korean Version].
Kim JH; Kong MY; Oh YH
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2016 Jun; 46(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 27411770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.
Hermans L; Olde Hartman TC; Dielissen PW
Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Sep; 68(674):e621-e626. PubMed ID: 30012809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire in a Dutch-speaking population.
Vanneste S; To WT; De Ridder D
Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Feb; 36(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 21208381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Content validity and internal consistency of the Dutch translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: an observational study.
Devriendt E; Van den Heede K; Coussement J; Dejaeger E; Surmont K; Heylen D; Schwendimann R; Sexton B; Wellens NI; Boonen S; Milisen K
Int J Nurs Stud; 2012 Mar; 49(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 22035966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
