These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27921002)

  • 1. Intention for Cesarean Section Versus Vaginal Delivery Among Pregnant Women in Isfahan: Correlates and Determinants.
    Shams-Ghahfarokhi Z; Khalajabadi-Farahani F
    J Reprod Infertil; 2016; 17(4):230-239. PubMed ID: 27921002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling the intention to choose natural vaginal delivery: using reasoned action and social cognitive theories.
    Kanani S; Allahverdipour H; AsghariJafarabadi M
    Health Promot Perspect; 2015; 5(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 26000243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributing factors of pregnant women's beliefs towards mode of delivery: a cross-sectional study from Iran.
    Zamani-Alavijeh F; Araban M; Hassanzadeh A; Makhouli K
    Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol; 2018; 4():9. PubMed ID: 29744129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey on the effects of husbands' education of pregnant women on knowledge, attitude, and reducing elective cesarean section.
    Sharifirad G; Rezaeian M; Soltani R; Javaheri S; Mazaheri MA
    J Educ Health Promot; 2013; 2():50. PubMed ID: 24251286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persuading Iranian Women toward Normal Vaginal Delivery: Using Pictorial Perception of the Labour Process.
    Kananikandeh S
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 6(6):1145-1152. PubMed ID: 29983818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Social Marketing to Reduce Intention of Cesarean Section in Iranian Women.
    Maleki M; Mousavizadeh A; Parhizkar S; Shams M
    J Pregnancy; 2021; 2021():3920126. PubMed ID: 33575043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low risk pregnancies after a cesarean section: Determinants of trial of labor and its failure.
    Lehmann S; Baghestan E; Børdahl PE; Irgens LM; Rasmussen S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226894. PubMed ID: 31929542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Eslami S; Aslani A; Tara F; Ghalichi L; Erfanian F; Abu-Hanna A
    Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():549. PubMed ID: 26634922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socio-cultural and clinician determinants in the maternal decision-making process in the choice for trial of labor vs. elective repeated cesarean section: a questionnaire comparison between Italian settings.
    Triunfo S; Minciotti C; Burlon B; Giovannangeli F; Danza M; Tateo S; Lanzone A
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Aug; 47(6):656-664. PubMed ID: 31211690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of induced labor on delivery outcome of pregnant women undergoing vaginal trial of labor after cesarean section].
    Cao YL; Zou LY; Zhang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 54(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 31550773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Related factors to choose normal vaginal delivery by mothers based on Health Belief Model.
    Baghianimoghadam MH; Zolghadar R; Moghadam BB; Darayi M; Jozy F
    J Educ Health Promot; 2012; 1():17. PubMed ID: 23555120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
    Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.
    Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Hesami E; Moradi F; Mazloomi E; Joulaei H; Khodayari M; Lankarani KB
    J Res Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 18(11):943-50. PubMed ID: 24523780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using theory of planned behavior for prediction of delivery mode among pregnant women: a theory-based cross-sectional research.
    Ghaffari M; Afshari A; Rakhshanderou S; Armoon B
    Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2017 Nov; 32(2):. PubMed ID: 29168964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012.
    Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rate in caesarean section and vaginal delivery.
    Ghahiri A; Khosravi M
    Adv Biomed Res; 2015; 4():193. PubMed ID: 26605232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indicators for mode of delivery in pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section: a retrospective study of 679 pregnant women.
    Hua Z; El Oualja F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Nov; 19(1):445. PubMed ID: 31775663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delivery preferences of pregnant women: Do not underestimate the effect of friends and relatives.
    Kosan Z; Kavuncuoglu D; Calıkoglu EO; Aras A
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 48(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 30904490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.