These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27921115)

  • 21. [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):540-8. PubMed ID: 27259640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests.
    Hagerman B
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):423-5. PubMed ID: 8054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss.
    Savaş VA; Gündüz B; Karamert R; Cevizci R; Düzlü M; Tutar H; Bayazit YA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 26991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [ADANO-Fall Meeting 2006 in Freiburg].
    Hoth S
    HNO; 2007 Jan; 55(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17180692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The ANL: does it, or does it not?
    Roeser RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):1. PubMed ID: 24219090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?
    Olsen SØ; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24219089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Picou EM; Marcrum SC; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25731581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech audiometry, speech perception, and cognitive functions : English version.
    Meister H
    HNO; 2017 Jan; 65(Suppl 1):1-4. PubMed ID: 27695891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hearing aid and hearing assistance technology use in Aotearoa/New Zealand.
    Kelly-Campbell RJ; Lessoway K
    Int J Audiol; 2015 May; 54(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 25634777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J; Rudert H; Brademann G; Frese K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Paediatric cochlear implantation criteria based on speech reception in noise.
    Steffens T; Hacker M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():217-20. PubMed ID: 21756616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech perception processes and fitting of hearing aids.
    Barfod J
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):430-41. PubMed ID: 496725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Owens E; Telleen CC
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1981 Mar; 107(3):160-3. PubMed ID: 6894086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.