These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

477 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27921268)

  • 1. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
    Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF; Dzeda KB; Wegner-Clemens K; Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Singing on Visual and Multisensory Speech Perception in Children on the Autism Spectrum.
    Feldman JI; Tu A; Conrad JG; Kuang W; Santapuram P; Woynaroski TG
    Multisens Res; 2022 Dec; 36(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 36731528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in audiovisual integration, as measured by McGurk phenomenon, among adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia and age-matched healthy control groups.
    Pearl D; Yodashkin-Porat D; Katz N; Valevski A; Aizenberg D; Sigler M; Weizman A; Kikinzon L
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19216897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.
    Peelle JE; Sommers MS
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():169-81. PubMed ID: 25890390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech cues contribute to audiovisual spatial integration.
    Bishop CW; Miller LM
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e24016. PubMed ID: 21909378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audio-visual integration during speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children revealed by the McGurk effect.
    Tona R; Naito Y; Moroto S; Yamamoto R; Fujiwara K; Yamazaki H; Shinohara S; Kikuchi M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2072-8. PubMed ID: 26455920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual integration in the McGurk effect is impervious to music training.
    Lee HH; Groves K; Ripollés P; Carrasco M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3262. PubMed ID: 38332159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audio-visual speech processing in age-related hearing loss: Stronger integration and increased frontal lobe recruitment.
    Rosemann S; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():425-437. PubMed ID: 29655940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.