These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27922285)

  • 21. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term.
    Abramovici D; Goldwasser S; Mabie BC; Mercer BM; Goldwasser R; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1108-12. PubMed ID: 10561627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol.
    Bracken H; Mundle S; Faragher B; Easterling T; Haycox A; Turner M; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Sep; 14():308. PubMed ID: 25193157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mL or 60mL: A randomized controlled trial.
    Sandberg EM; Schepers EM; Sitter RLV; Huisman CMA; Wijngaarden WJV
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Apr; 211():150-155. PubMed ID: 28260689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
    Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preparation for induction of labour of the unfavourable cervix with Foley catheter compared with vaginal prostaglandin.
    Thomas IL; Chenoweth JN; Tronc GN; Johnson IR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Feb; 26(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 3524549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial.
    Appadurai U; Gan F; Hong J; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Nov; 5(11):101157. PubMed ID: 37722505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
    Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
    Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Foley catheterisation versus oral misoprostol for induction of labour in hypertensive women in India (INFORM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Mundle S; Bracken H; Khedikar V; Mulik J; Faragher B; Easterling T; Leigh S; Granby P; Haycox A; Turner MA; Alfirevic Z; Winikoff B; Weeks AD
    Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10095):669-680. PubMed ID: 28668289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction.
    Chavakula PR; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Londhe V; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 May; 129(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 25661322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Routine vaginal examination to assess labor progress at 8 compared to 4 hours after early amniotomy following Foley balloon ripening in the labor induction of multiparas: a randomized trial.
    Aishah M; Kamarudin M; Hong J; Sethi N; Hamdan M; Tan PC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Apr; 6(4):101325. PubMed ID: 38447677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.
    Sarreau M; Isly H; Poulain P; Fontaine B; Morel O; Villemonteix P; Mares P; Mousty E; Godard A; Ragot S; Pierre F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 31432510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
    Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of mechanical and nonmechanical methods of cervix ripening in women with pre-labor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mokhtarpour S; Sahhaf F; Vahedi L; Sani A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Apr; 5(4):100868. PubMed ID: 36690182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial.
    Eser A; Ozkaya E; Abide CY; Eser T; Eser GY; Abike F; Tayyar AT; Eroglu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 30536117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial.
    Abdi N; Alavi A; Pakbaz F; Darabi H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jul; 21(1):533. PubMed ID: 34315413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Ten Eikelder ML; van Pampus MG; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van der Post JA; van der Salm P; Scheepers HC; Schuitemaker N; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):137-45. PubMed ID: 23870188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.