These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27922533)

  • 1. A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.
    Desai RJ; Rothman KJ; Bateman BT; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF
    Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 27922533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 18471657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods.
    Guertin JR; Rahme E; Dormuth CR; LeLorier J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():22. PubMed ID: 26891796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of two propensity score-based methods for balancing covariates: the overlap weighting and fine stratification methods in real-world claims data.
    Wan W; Murugesan M; Nocon RS; Bolton J; Konetzka RT; Chin MH; Huang ES
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38831393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregabalin use early in pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations.
    Patorno E; Bateman BT; Huybrechts KF; MacDonald SC; Cohen JM; Desai RJ; Panchaud A; Mogun H; Pennell PB; Hernandez-Diaz S
    Neurology; 2017 May; 88(21):2020-2025. PubMed ID: 28446648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of adverse fetal outcomes following administration of a pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccine during pregnancy.
    Pasternak B; Svanström H; Mølgaard-Nielsen D; Krause TG; Emborg HD; Melbye M; Hviid A
    JAMA; 2012 Jul; 308(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 22782418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of propensity score technique to account for exposure-related covariates: an example and lesson.
    Seeger JD; Kurth T; Walker AM
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S143-8. PubMed ID: 17909373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and the Risk of Congenital Malformations.
    Bateman BT; Patorno E; Desai RJ; Seely EW; Mogun H; Dejene SZ; Fischer MA; Friedman AM; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):174-184. PubMed ID: 27926639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An application of propensity score matching using claims data.
    Seeger JD; Williams PL; Walker AM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Jul; 14(7):465-76. PubMed ID: 15651087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the comparability of osteoporosis treatments using propensity score and negative control outcome methods in UK and Denmark electronic health record databases.
    Tan EH; Rathod-Mistry T; Strauss VY; O'Kelly J; Giorgianni F; Baxter R; Brunetti VC; Pedersen AB; Ehrenstein V; Prieto-Alhambra D
    J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Aug; 39(7):844-854. PubMed ID: 38619297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Austin PC
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 19197955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stratification for the propensity score compared with linear regression techniques to assess the effect of treatment or exposure.
    Senn S; Graf E; Caputo A
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5529-44. PubMed ID: 18058851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Utility of Coarsened Exact Matching for Pharmacoepidemiology Using Real and Simulated Claims Data.
    Ripollone JE; Huybrechts KF; Rothman KJ; Ferguson RE; Franklin JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 189(6):613-622. PubMed ID: 31845719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.