These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27922533)
21. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes. Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment. Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate. Hade EM; Lu B Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statin exposure during first trimester of pregnancy is associated with fetal ventricular septal defect. Lee MS; Hekimian A; Doctorian T; Duan L Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 269():111-113. PubMed ID: 29996977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. On regression adjustment for the propensity score. Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Propensity scores in observational research]. Groenwold RH Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(29):A6179. PubMed ID: 23859107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis. Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Propensity Score Weighting and Trimming Strategies for Reducing Variance and Bias of Treatment Effect Estimates: A Simulation Study. Stürmer T; Webster-Clark M; Lund JL; Wyss R; Ellis AR; Lunt M; Rothman KJ; Glynn RJ Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 190(8):1659-1670. PubMed ID: 33615349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders. Arbogast PG; Ray WA Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using Super Learner Prediction Modeling to Improve High-dimensional Propensity Score Estimation. Wyss R; Schneeweiss S; van der Laan M; Lendle SD; Ju C; Franklin JM Epidemiology; 2018 Jan; 29(1):96-106. PubMed ID: 28991001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vector-based kernel weighting: A simple estimator for improving precision and bias of average treatment effects in multiple treatment settings. Garrido MM; Lum J; Pizer SD Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1204-1223. PubMed ID: 33327037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation. Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cholesterol-lowering effect of statin therapy in a clinical HIV cohort: an application of double propensity score adjustment. Levy ME; Ma Y; Magnus M; Younes N; Castel AD; Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44():8-15. PubMed ID: 32204991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Impact of Nondifferential Exposure Misclassification on the Performance of Propensity Scores for Continuous and Binary Outcomes: A Simulation Study. Wood ME; Chrysanthopoulou S; Nordeng HME; Lapane KL Med Care; 2018 Aug; 56(8):e46-e53. PubMed ID: 28922298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Confounder-adjusted estimates of the risk difference using propensity score-based weighting. Ukoumunne OC; Williamson E; Forbes AB; Gulliford MC; Carlin JB Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3126-36. PubMed ID: 21170907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Introduction to an individual-based standardization method -- propensity score weighting]. Li ZW; Liu JM; Ren AG Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 31(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 21215089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Austin PC; Mamdani MM Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2084-106. PubMed ID: 16220490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]