These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27922832)

  • 1. Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): 1. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys.
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publisher's Note on: 'Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): I. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys' (2017 J. Radiol. Prot. 37 1) and 'Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose' (2017 J. Radiol. Prot. 37 623).
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):E19-E23. PubMed ID: 32901613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose.
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):623-634. PubMed ID: 28682791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retraction: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): 1. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys (2017
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Jul; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 34987134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corrigendum: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5–51 months after the Fukushima NPP Accident (series): I. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys (2016 J. Radiat. Prot. 37 1).
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):320. PubMed ID: 31977169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between Individual External Doses, Ambient Dose Rates and Individuals' Activity-Patterns in Affected Areas in Fukushima following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
    Naito W; Uesaka M; Yamada C; Kurosawa T; Yasutaka T; Ishii H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158879. PubMed ID: 27494021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retraction: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose (2017
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Jul; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 34009139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring and assessing individual external doses during the rehabilitation phase in Iitate village after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Naito W; Uesaka M; Kurosawa T; Kuroda Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):606-622. PubMed ID: 28510538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating Annual Individual Doses for Evacuees Returning Home to Areas Affected by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Yajima K; Kurihara O; Ohmachi Y; Takada M; Omori Y; Akahane K; Kim E; Torikoshi M; Yonehara H; Yoshida S; Sakai K; Akashi M
    Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 26107433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of external doses between radio-contaminated areas and areas with high natural terrestrial background using the individual dosimeter 'D-shuttle' 75 months after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Tsubokura M; Nomura S; Yoshida I; Sawano T; Miyazaki M; Tomita S; Tomoyoshi O; Watanabe M
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 29235452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurements of individual radiation doses in residents living around the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant.
    Nagataki S; Takamura N; Kamiya K; Akashi M
    Radiat Res; 2013 Nov; 180(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 24131040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment Model of Radiation Doses from External Exposure to the Public after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
    Takahara S; Iijima M; Watanabe M
    Health Phys; 2020 Jun; 118(6):664-677. PubMed ID: 31934934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health management and care following the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident: overview of Fukushima Health Management Survey.
    Kamiya K
    Ann ICRP; 2021 Jul; 50(1_suppl):82-89. PubMed ID: 34218678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External Doses Available for Epidemiological Studies Related to the Fukushima Health Management Survey: First 4-month Individual Doses and Municipality-average Doses for the First Year.
    Ishikawa T; Yasumura S; Akahane K; Yonai S; Sakai A; Kurihara O; Hosoya M; Sakata R; Ohira T; Ohto H; Kamiya K
    J Epidemiol; 2022; 32(Suppl_XII):S11-S22. PubMed ID: 36464295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring individual external doses of Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings employees living in Fukushima prefecture.
    Uchiyama K; Ishii T; Koyabu K; Takizawa K; Muto S
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):667-691. PubMed ID: 32454474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tenth Warren K. Sinclair keynote address-the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and comprehensive health risk management.
    Yamashita S
    Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 24378490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstruction of a Fukushima accident-derived radiocesium fallout map for environmental transfer studies.
    Kato H; Onda Y; Gao X; Sanada Y; Saito K
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Dec; 210():105996. PubMed ID: 31262609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low dose of external exposure among returnees to former evacuation areas: a cross-sectional all-municipality joint study following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant incident.
    Nomura S; Murakami M; Naito W; Yasutaka T; Sawano T; Tsubokura M
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Mar; 40(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 31809269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of childhood thyroid cancer prevalence among 3 areas based on external radiation dose after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: The Fukushima health management survey.
    Ohira T; Takahashi H; Yasumura S; Ohtsuru A; Midorikawa S; Suzuki S; Fukushima T; Shimura H; Ishikawa T; Sakai A; Yamashita S; Tanigawa K; Ohto H; Abe M; Suzuki S;
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Aug; 95(35):e4472. PubMed ID: 27583855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Probabilistic Approach to Assess External Doses to the Public Considering Spatial Variability of Radioactive Contamination and Interpopulation Differences in Behavior Pattern.
    Takahara S; Iijima M; Yoneda M; Shimada Y
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):212-224. PubMed ID: 28884836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.