BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27922879)

  • 1. The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a "Tidal Volume Challenge" Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation.
    Myatra SN; Prabu NR; Divatia JV; Monnet X; Kulkarni AP; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 27922879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
    Liu Y; Wei LQ; Li GQ; Yu X; Li GF; Li YM
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 26457754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study.
    Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; De Rosa S; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 36(8):583-591. PubMed ID: 31021879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
    Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
    Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
    Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Prone Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Protective Ventilation: Role of Dynamic Indices, Tidal Volume Challenge, and End-Expiratory Occlusion Test.
    Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Baggiani M; Bennett V; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Mar; 130(3):752-761. PubMed ID: 31651455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.
    Perner A; Faber T
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pulse pressure variation and prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated with low tidal volumes.
    Oliveira-Costa CD; Friedman G; Vieira SR; Fialkow L
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Jul; 67(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 22892922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies.
    Freitas FG; Bafi AT; Nascente AP; Assunção M; Mazza B; Azevedo LC; Machado FR
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Mar; 110(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 23161359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.
    Marik PE; Cavallazzi R; Vasu T; Hirani A
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):2642-7. PubMed ID: 19602972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in end-tidal CO2 could predict fluid responsiveness in the passive leg raising test but not in the mini-fluid challenge test: A prospective and observational study.
    Xiao-ting W; Hua Z; Da-wei L; Hong-min Z; Huai-wu H; Yun L; Wen-zhao C
    J Crit Care; 2015 Oct; 30(5):1061-6. PubMed ID: 26140954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of tidal volume challenge on the reliability of plethysmography variability index in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries: a prospective interventional study.
    Botros JM; Salem YSM; Khalil M; Algyar MF; Yassin HM
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2023 Oct; 37(5):1275-1285. PubMed ID: 36933167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. End-Expiratory Occlusion Test Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Protective Ventilation in the Operating Room.
    Biais M; Larghi M; Henriot J; de Courson H; Sesay M; Nouette-Gaulain K
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Dec; 125(6):1889-1895. PubMed ID: 28742783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
    Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance.
    Xu Y; Guo J; Wu Q; Chen J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2022 May; 22(1):137. PubMed ID: 35508962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance.
    Monnet X; Bleibtreu A; Ferré A; Dres M; Gharbi R; Richard C; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2012 Jan; 40(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 21926581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.