These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Webster versus reproductive health services. Rhodes AM MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1989; 14(6):423. PubMed ID: 2514333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision. Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights. Chopko ME Health Prog; 1989 Jun; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bare court majority reaffirms Roe, but standard for reviewing state laws is relaxed. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Jul; (11):1-3. PubMed ID: 12286280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Rehnquistean bed: the abortion issue revisited. Maher VF; Badin R J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1990 Dec; 21(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 2269898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion 1982: the Supreme Court once again. Healey JM Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):681. PubMed ID: 7172671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Supreme Court on abortion. Roe v. Wade, 41 U.S.L.W. 4213(1973). Conn Med; 1973 Jun; 37(6):279-89. PubMed ID: 4706076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court's ruling in the Webster case: implications for Georgia physicians. Harris AL J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Sep; 78(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 2778409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade. Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade and the lesson of the pre-Roe case law. Morgan RG Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1724-48. PubMed ID: 10245969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions. Orentlicher D Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2603860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]