These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27923547)

  • 21. Separate collection of the biodegradable fraction of MSW: an economic assessment.
    Gomes AP; Matos MA; Carvalho IC
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(10):1711-9. PubMed ID: 17980574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Operation costs and pollutant emissions reduction by definition of new collection scheduling and optimization of MSW collection routes using GIS. The case study of Barreiro, Portugal.
    Zsigraiova Z; Semiao V; Beijoco F
    Waste Manag; 2013 Apr; 33(4):793-806. PubMed ID: 23266322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EPR--some personal and professional perspectives.
    Cooper J
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Mar; 29(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 21368019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pneumatic vs. door-to-door waste collection systems in existing urban areas: a comparison of economic performance.
    Teerioja N; Moliis K; Kuvaja E; Ollikainen M; Punkkinen H; Merta E
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1782-91. PubMed ID: 22721607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment.
    Giugliano M; Cernuschi S; Grosso M; Rigamonti L
    Waste Manag; 2011; 31(9-10):2092-101. PubMed ID: 21482096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Polyethylene recycling: Waste policy scenario analysis for the EU-27.
    Andreoni V; Saveyn HG; Eder P
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 158():103-10. PubMed ID: 25976302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Costs and benefits of pneumatic collection in three specific New York City cases.
    Miller B; Spertus J; Kamga C
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1957-66. PubMed ID: 25041691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Irkutsk (Russia) using a life cycle assessment-integrated waste management model.
    Tulokhonova A; Ulanova O
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 May; 31(5):475-84. PubMed ID: 23444153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of efficiency of waste reverse logistics for recycling.
    Veiga MM
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10 Suppl):26-34. PubMed ID: 23997069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Full cost accounting in the analysis of separated waste collection efficiency: A methodological proposal.
    D'Onza G; Greco G; Allegrini M
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Feb; 167():59-65. PubMed ID: 26613351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. System analysis of waste oil management in Finland.
    Kapustina V; Havukainen J; Virkki-Hatakka T; Horttanainen M
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Apr; 32(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 24599333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Environmental gains in the collection of packaging waste obtained in Uskudar district by changing the collection type.
    Avsar Y; Uksal F; Bilgili L
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):281-293. PubMed ID: 34432608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parametric analysis of environmental performance of reused/recycled packaging.
    Tsiliyannis CA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Dec; 39(24):9770-7. PubMed ID: 16475365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A dynamic optimization model for solid waste recycling.
    Anghinolfi D; Paolucci M; Robba M; Taramasso AC
    Waste Manag; 2013 Feb; 33(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 23158873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Re-thinking incentives and penalties: economic aspects of waste management in Italy.
    Cossu R; Masi S
    Waste Manag; 2013 Nov; 33(11):2541-7. PubMed ID: 23769830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating environmental impacts of alternative construction waste management approaches using supply-chain-linked life-cycle analysis.
    Kucukvar M; Egilmez G; Tatari O
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jun; 32(6):500-8. PubMed ID: 24855225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the transport requirements of different curbside waste collection systems in Denmark.
    Zbib H; Wøhlk S
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():21-32. PubMed ID: 31109520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental and economic evaluation of pre-disaster plans for disaster waste management: Case study of Minami-Ise, Japan.
    Tabata T; Wakabayashi Y; Tsai P; Saeki T
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():386-396. PubMed ID: 28027813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Post-consumer plastic packaging waste in England: Assessing the yield of multiple collection-recycling schemes.
    Hahladakis JN; Purnell P; Iacovidou E; Velis CA; Atseyinku M
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():149-159. PubMed ID: 29439928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Expanding worldwide urban solid waste recycling: The Brazilian social technology in waste pickers inclusion.
    Rutkowski JE; Rutkowski EW
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1084-93. PubMed ID: 26467319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.