178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27923551)
1. Absorbed dose and image quality of Varian TrueBeam CBCT compared with OBI CBCT.
Kawahara D; Ozawa S; Nakashima T; Suzuki T; Tsuneda M; Tanaka S; Ohno Y; Murakami Y; Nagata Y
Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1628-1633. PubMed ID: 27923551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absorbed dose measurements for kV-cone beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.
Hioki K; Araki F; Ohno T; Nakaguchi Y; Tomiyama Y
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7297-313. PubMed ID: 25383908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation into image quality and dose for different patient geometries with multiple cone-beam CT systems.
Gardner SJ; Studenski MT; Giaddui T; Cui Y; Galvin J; Yu Y; Xiao Y
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031908. PubMed ID: 24593726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of the stability of image-quality parameters of Varian on-board imaging (OBI) and EPID imaging systems.
Stanley DN; Papanikolaou N; Gutierrez AN
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):5088. PubMed ID: 26103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography.
Miura H; Ozawa S; Okazue T; Kawakubo A; Yamada K; Nagata Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29667294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system.
Palm A; Nilsson E; Herrnsdorf L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 11(1):3085. PubMed ID: 20160695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of practical approaches to evaluating cumulative dose for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) from standard CT dosimetry measurements: a Monte Carlo study.
Abuhaimed A; Martin CJ; Sankaralingam M; Gentle DJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):5413-38. PubMed ID: 26118740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose calculation accuracy of different image value to density tables for cone-beam CT planning in head & neck and pelvic localizations.
Barateau A; Garlopeau C; Cugny A; De Figueiredo BH; Dupin C; Caron J; Antoine M
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25595131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior kV-CBCT scanning of the head and neck region minimizes doses to critical organs with sustained image quality.
Khamfongkhruea C; Utapom K; Munsing S; Suttiprapha S; Tannanonta C; Yabsantia S
Phys Med; 2015 Jul; 31(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 25921330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An image quality comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems.
Kamath S; Song W; Chvetsov A; Ozawa S; Lu H; Samant S; Liu C; Li JG; Palta JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 12(2):3435. PubMed ID: 21587192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom.
Poirier Y; Tambasco M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):155-171. PubMed ID: 27455477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols.
Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterizing a novel scintillating glass for application to megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
Hu YH; Shedlock D; Wang A; Rottmann J; Baturin P; Myronakis M; Huber P; Fueglistaller R; Shi M; Morf D; Star-Lack J; Berbeco RI
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30586163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: Assessing the performance of monthly CBCT image quality QA.
Manger RP; Pawlicki T; Hoisak J; Kim GY
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 30972767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of Absorbed Dose for CBCT in Image-guided Radiation Therapy: Comparison of Each Devices and Facilities].
Kitazato Y; Kuga N; Shirieda K; Enzaki M; Nakaguchi Y; Shimohigashi Y; Kawasaki T; Toyoda M; Kawahara D; Araki F; Kawamura S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 28428474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of lens absorbed dose with Cone Beam IGRT procedures.
Palomo R; Pujades MC; Gimeno-Olmos J; Carmona V; Lliso F; Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Dec; 35(4):N33-41. PubMed ID: 26457404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region - a phantom study.
Elstrøm UV; Olsen SR; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1114-24. PubMed ID: 24975372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
