These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27923882)

  • 1. Why the New FDA Glucose Meter POCT Guidance Is Disappointing.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1274. PubMed ID: 27923882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the New FDA Guidance Documents Help Improving Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Compared With ISO 15197?
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Pleus S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1240-1246. PubMed ID: 28587476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood glucose meters.
    Wahowiak L
    Diabetes Forecast; 2014 Jan; 67(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 25868294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meeting the New FDA Standard for Accuracy of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Test Systems Intended for Home Use by Lay Users.
    Katz LB; Stewart L; King D; Cameron H
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 14(5):912-916. PubMed ID: 32059615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Precision and Bias Specifications Required to Achieve the 2018 FDA Guidance Criteria for Glucose Meter Performance Using Simulation Models.
    Lyon AW; Lyon ME
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):513-518. PubMed ID: 31752535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Accuracy Guidelines for Hospital Glucose Meters.
    Bowman CF; Nichols JH
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):546-552. PubMed ID: 31983225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Real-World Setting Study: Which Glucose Meter Could Be the Best for POCT Use? An Easy and Applicable Protocol During the Hospital Routine.
    Mancini A; Esposto G; Manfrini S; Rilli S; Tinti G; Carta G; Petrolati L; Vidali M; Barocci S
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1053-1060. PubMed ID: 29783898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New Criteria for Assessing the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Monitors meeting, October 28, 2011.
    Walsh J; Roberts R; Vigersky RA; Schwartz F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):466-74. PubMed ID: 22538160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ISO 15197:2013 Accuracy Evaluation of Two CE-Marked Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.
    Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):934-5. PubMed ID: 25901021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing: Post-Market Performance Assessment of the Accu-Chek Inform II Hospital-Use Glucose Meter].
    Petryaykina EE; Mayanskiy NA; Demina ES; Karamysheva IV; Gorst KA; Timofeev AV
    Ter Arkh; 2023 Dec; 95(12):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 38785055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FDA urged to tighten glucose meter standards.
    Traynor K
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 May; 67(9):695-8. PubMed ID: 20410540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why the Diabetes Technology Society Surveillance Protocol for Glucose Meters Needs to Be Revised.
    Krouwer JS
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1247-1249. PubMed ID: 28376646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside glucose testing systems.
    CAP Today; 2001 Mar; 15(3):26-34. PubMed ID: 11322144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy in blood glucose measurement: what will a tightening of requirements yield?
    Heinemann L; Lodwig V; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 6(2):435-43. PubMed ID: 22538158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy Evaluation of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Berti F; Scuffi C; Valgimigli F
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(6):1354-6. PubMed ID: 26224761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System's Measurement Accuracy.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Kamecke U; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 11(6):1275-1276. PubMed ID: 28849677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noninvasive glucose-monitoring device gains FDA approval.
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2001 May; 58(10):854, 857. PubMed ID: 11381486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulation Catches Up to Reality.
    Edelman SV
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jan; 11(1):160-164. PubMed ID: 27630249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FDA Approval of Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: A Potentially Risky Decision.
    Shapiro AR
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1541-1542. PubMed ID: 28910454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpreting method evaluations.
    Nichols JH
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2002; 4(5):623-5. PubMed ID: 12450443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.