These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27923966)

  • 1. Thinking Style as a Predictor of Men's Participation in Cancer Screening.
    McGuiness CE; Turnbull D; Wilson C; Duncan A; Flight IH; Zajac I
    Am J Mens Health; 2017 Mar; 11(2):318-329. PubMed ID: 27923966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of US and Australian men's values and preferences for PSA screening.
    Howard K; Brenner AT; Lewis C; Sheridan S; Crutchfield T; Hawley S; Nielsen ME; Pignone MP
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Oct; 13():388. PubMed ID: 24093428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Men's preferences and trade-offs for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.
    Howard K; Salkeld GP; Patel MI; Mann GJ; Pignone MP
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):3123-35. PubMed ID: 25382490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.
    Duncan A; Turnbull D; Wilson C; Osborne JM; Cole SR; Flight I; Young GP
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Mar; 14():238. PubMed ID: 24606951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate cancer screening in men with a family history of prostate cancer: the role of partners in influencing men's screening uptake.
    Meiser B; Cowan R; Costello A; Giles GG; Lindeman GJ; Gaff CL
    Urology; 2007 Oct; 70(4):738-42. PubMed ID: 17991547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.
    Pinsky PF; Blacka A; Kramer BS; Miller A; Prorok PC; Berg C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Aug; 7(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 20571134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Associated with Cancer Screening Among Hopi Men.
    Batai K; Sanderson PR; Hsu CH; Joshweseoma L; Russell D; Joshweseoma L; Ojeda J; Burhansstipanov L; Brown SR; Ami D; Saboda K; Harris RB
    J Cancer Educ; 2022 Aug; 37(4):915-923. PubMed ID: 33083892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Awareness and uptake of colorectal, breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening tests in Spain.
    Carrasco-Garrido P; Hernandez-Barrera V; Lopez de Andres A; Jimenez-Trujillo I; Gallardo Pino C; Jimenez-Garcıa R
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Apr; 24(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 23813710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening.
    Frederiksen BL; Jørgensen T; Brasso K; Holten I; Osler M
    Br J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 103(10):1496-501. PubMed ID: 20959827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.
    Woods VD; Montgomery SB; Herring RP; Gardner RW; Stokols D
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2006 Apr; 98(4):492-504. PubMed ID: 16623061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for Deliberation and Perceived Usefulness of Standard- and Narrative-Style Leaflet Designs: Implications for Equitable Cancer-Screening Communication.
    Robb KA; Gatting LP; von Wagner C; McGregor LM
    Ann Behav Med; 2020 Feb; 54(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 31595299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT)-based colorectal cancer screening trends and predictors of non-use: findings from the South Australian setting and implications for increasing FOBT uptake.
    Todorov K; Wilson C; Sharplin G; Corsini N
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 28248632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Duncan A; Zajac I; Flight I; Stewart BJ; Wilson C; Turnbull D
    Trials; 2013 Jul; 14():239. PubMed ID: 23902589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Croatia (2007-2011).
    Katičić M; Antoljak N; Kujundžić M; Stamenić V; Skoko Poljak D; Kramarić D; Stimac D; Strnad Pešikan M; Samija M; Ebling Z
    World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4300-7. PubMed ID: 22969192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening men for prostate cancer and colorectal cancer: is practice evidence-based?
    Chun FK; Suardi N; Perrotte P; Lebeau T; Guay JP; Benayoun S; Ramirez A; Bénard F; McCormack M; Valiquette L; Karakiewicz P
    Can J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):3727-33. PubMed ID: 18163923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening.
    Thomas R; Glasziou P; Rychetnik L; Mackenzie G; Gardiner R; Doust J
    BMJ Open; 2014 Dec; 4(12):e005691. PubMed ID: 25539779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Colorectal, cervical and prostate cancer screening in Australians with severe mental illness: Retrospective nation-wide cohort study.
    Tuesley KM; Jordan SJ; Siskind DJ; Kendall BJ; Kisely S
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2019 Jun; 53(6):550-558. PubMed ID: 30501394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determinants of participation in prostate cancer screening: a simple analytical framework to account for healthy-user bias.
    Tabuchi T; Nakayama T; Fukushima W; Matsunaga I; Ohfuji S; Kondo K; Kawano E; Fukuhara H; Ito Y; Oshima A
    Cancer Sci; 2015 Jan; 106(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 25456306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The short to medium term benefits of the Australian colorectal cancer screening program.
    Taylor S; Salimi F; Earnest A; Heriot AG; Zalcberg JR; Ahern S
    Med J Aust; 2021 Feb; 214(2):90-92. PubMed ID: 33230836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tailored telephone counselling to increase participation of underusers in a population-based colorectal cancer-screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A randomized controlled trial.
    Denis B; Broc G; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Gana K; Perrin P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2017 Feb; 65(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28089385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.